Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of systolic blood pressure and low density lipoprotein on carotid plaques / 中华预防医学杂志
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; (12): 1074-1078, 2012.
Article in Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-274783
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the different effects of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and low density lipoprotein on carotid plaques (LDL-C).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 101 510 serving and retired workers of a company who participated in the health examination in 2006-2009, 5852 participants were selected as study subjects by stratified random sampling according to the age and sex ratio. These subjects took their health examination in 2010-2011 including the carotid ultrasound. Finally, 5361 eligible participants with complete data were included in the analysis. The detection and weighted rates of carotid plaques were calculated for four groups: normal SBP and LDL-C group (3524 subjects), normal SBP and high LDL-C group (356 subjects), elevated SBP and normal LDL-C group (1308 subjects) and elevated SBP and high LDL-C group (173 subjects). The effects of different baseline SBP and LDL-C on detection rates of the carotid artery plaques were analyzed by logistic regression.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The detection rate of carotid plaques in normal SBP and LDL-C group, normal SBP and high LDL-C group, elevated SBP and normal LDL-C group, elevated SBP and high LDL-C group was 33.7% (1186/3524), 41.3% (147/356), 64.8% (847/1308), 68.8% (119/173) (χ(2) = 425.75, P < 0.05) and the weighted detection rate was 36.0%, 42.0%, 64.5% and 68.3% respectively. For men, the detection rate was 44.2% (877/1985), 51.1% (97/190), 70.6% (657/930), 71.3% (82/115) (χ(2) = 194.02, P < 0.05) and the weighted detection rate was 31.2%, 36.1%, 49.8% and 50.3% respectively. For women, the detection rate was 20.1% (309/1539), 30.1% (50/166), 50.3% (190/378), 63.8% (37/58) (χ(2) = 180.17, P < 0.05) and the weighted detection rate was 30.9%, 46.3%, 70.3%, and 88.1% respectively. After adjusted for other risk factors, the OR (95%CI) value was 1.37 (1.05 - 1.78), 2.05 (1.74 - 2.43) and 2.12 (1.45 - 3.12) for normal SBP and high LDL-C group, elevated SBP and normal LDL-C group and elevated SBP and high LDL-C group respectively compared with normal SBP and LDL-C group.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Elevated SBP and high LDL-C were risk factors of the carotid artery plaques. Compared with high LDL-C, elevated SBP may add a higher risk for carotid plaques.</p>
Subject(s)
Full text: 1 Database: WPRIM Main subject: Systole / Blood / Blood Pressure / Epidemiology / Risk Factors / Carotid Stenosis / Dyslipidemias / Cholesterol, LDL Type of study: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: Zh Journal: Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi Year: 2012 Document type: Article
Full text: 1 Database: WPRIM Main subject: Systole / Blood / Blood Pressure / Epidemiology / Risk Factors / Carotid Stenosis / Dyslipidemias / Cholesterol, LDL Type of study: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: Zh Journal: Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi Year: 2012 Document type: Article