Evaluation and thinking of clinical practice teaching files / 中华医学教育探索杂志
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
; (12): 1259-1262, 2016.
Article
in Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-508762
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective Tocheck and evaluate on clinical practice teaching files for providing a foundation of improved clinical teaching levels with enhanced establishment of practice teaching files. Methods The practice teaching files of eighteen clinical departments in a military medical university were selected as the subject and were evenly divided into teaching plans and teaching records as well as teach-ing summary three parts and 15 items. Each item had 2 scores in which quantity had one score and quality has another one. Evaluation results were converted into 100 points system. Results Among practice teach-ing files of eighteen clinical departments, 4 scored more than 90, 8 scored between 80 to 89, 3 scored between 70 to 79, 3 scored between 60 to 69. Three advanced departments are obstetrics and gynecology, auxiliary department and emergency department. There were no significant differences in the scores of major surgery and internal medicine. Compared with that of other departments in the hospital, the specialty of hospital had low scores. It showed that most of the clinical practice of the file information was relatively sound with complete records and some departments had missing items or incomplete and non-standard doc-umentation records. Conclusion Qualitative study on practice teaching files can reflect clinical practice teaching quality. And it is meaningful for us to enhance teaching files construction and to improve clinical practice teaching levels.
Full text:
1
Database:
WPRIM
Type of study:
Evaluation_studies
/
Qualitative_research
Language:
Zh
Journal:
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
Year:
2016
Document type:
Article