Point-of-care ultrasound versus radiology department pelvic ultrasound on emergency department length of stay / 世界急诊医学杂志(英文)
World Journal of Emergency Medicine
; (4): 178-182, 2016.
Article
in En
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-789760
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
@#BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare the time to overall length of stay (LOS) for patients who underwent point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) versus radiology department ultrasound (RDUS).METHODS: This was a prospective study on a convenience sample of patients who required pelvic ultrasound imaging as part of their emergency department (ED) assessment.RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 194 patients who were on average 32 years-old. Ninety-eight (51%) patients were pregnant (<20 weeks). Time to completion of RDUS was 66 minutes longer than POCUS (95%CI 60–73,P<0.01). Patients randomized to the RDUS arm experienced a 120 minute longer ED length of stay (LOS) (95%CI 66–173,P<0.01)CONCLUSION: In patients who require pelvic ultrasound as part of their diagnostic evaluation, POCUS resulted in a signifi cant decrease in time to ultrasound and ED LOS.
Full text:
1
Database:
WPRIM
Type of study:
Clinical_trials
/
Observational_studies
Language:
En
Journal:
World Journal of Emergency Medicine
Year:
2016
Document type:
Article