Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ACR appropriateness criteria second and third trimester screening for fetal anomaly
Sussman, Betsy; Chopra, Prajna; Poder, Liina; Bulas, Dorothy; Burger, Ingrid; Feldstein, Vickie; Laifer-Narin, Sherelle; Oliver, Edward; Strachowski, Loretta; Wang, Eileen; Winter, Tom; Zelop, Carolyn; Glanc, Phyllis.
Afiliación
  • Sussman, Betsy; University of Vermont Medical Center. Burlington. US
  • Chopra, Prajna; University of Vermont Medical Center. Burlington. US
  • Poder, Liina; University of California. San Francisco. US
  • Bulas, Dorothy; Children's National Hospital. George Washington University. Washington. US
  • Burger, Ingrid; Kaiser Permanente. Los Angeles. US
  • Feldstein, Vickie; University of California San Francisco. San Francisco. US
  • Laifer-Narin, Sherelle; Columbia University Medical Center. NY Presbyterian Hospital. New York. US
  • Oliver, Edward; University of Pennsylvania. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Perelman School of Medicine. Philadelphia. US
  • Strachowski, Loretta; University of California San Francisco. San Francisco. US
  • Wang, Eileen; Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia. US
  • Winter, Tom; University of Utah. Salt Lake City. US
  • Zelop, Carolyn; NYU School of Medicine. New York. US
  • Glanc, Phyllis; University of Toront. Sunnybrook Health Sciences. Toronto. CA
J. Am. Coll. Radiol ; 18(supl. 5): [10], May 1, 2021. tab
Article en En | BIGG | ID: biblio-1255337
Biblioteca responsable: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
The Appropriateness Criteria for the imaging screening of second and third trimester fetuses for anomalies are presented for fetuses that are low risk, high risk, have had soft markers detected on ultrasound, and have had major anomalies detected on ultrasound. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 05-specialized Base de datos: BIGG Asunto principal: Anomalías Congénitas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: J. Am. Coll. Radiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 05-specialized Base de datos: BIGG Asunto principal: Anomalías Congénitas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: J. Am. Coll. Radiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article