Bioethics in medical care rationing during the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic
Rev. invest. clín
; Rev. invest. clín;73(1): 1-5, Jan.-Feb. 2021. tab, graf
Article
en En
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-1289737
Biblioteca responsable:
BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background:
Coronavirus (CoV) disease (COVID)-19 poses difficult situations in which the ethical course of action is not clear, or choices are made between equally unacceptable responses.Methods:
A web search was performed using the terms bioethics; COVID-19; ethics; severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV-2; emergent care; pandemic; and public health emergencies.Results:
Protection from COVID-19 has resulted in the cancellation of necessary medical interventions, lengthened suffering, and potential non-COVID-19 deaths. Prolonged lockdown reduced well-being, triggering or aggravating mental illnesses and violence, and escalated medical risks. Collateral damage includes restrictions on visitations to hospitals, alienation from the deceased relative, or lack of warm caring of patients. Finally, in a public health crisis, public health interest overrides individual rights if it results in severe harm to the community.Conclusion:
Balancing ethical dilemmas are one more challenge in the COVID-19 pandemic. (REV INVEST CLIN. 2021;73(1)1-5)Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
LILACS
Asunto principal:
Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto
/
Mala Conducta Científica
/
Publicación de Acceso Abierto
Aspecto:
Ethics
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Rev. invest. clín
Asunto de la revista:
MEDICINA
Año:
2021
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
México
Pais de publicación:
México