Comparison of the reproducibility of two cervical vertebrae maturation methods
Braz. j. oral sci
; 21: e226415, jan.-dez. 2022. tab
Artículo
en Inglés
| LILACS, BBO - Odontología
| ID: biblio-1354995
Biblioteca responsable:
BR218.1
ABSTRACT
Aim:
Facial orthopaedic treatments based on the stimulation or restrictions of craniofacial bone growth are more effective when carried out during the pubertal growth spurt. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the reproducibility of two cervical vertebrae methods (CVM) with manual tracing and direct visual inspection.Methods:
A sample of 60 lateral cephalometric radiographs (10 of each of the 6 CVM stages) was randomly selected from 171 records. 5 orthodontists classified these radiographs according to the skeletal maturation stage in 2002 and 2005, and the application of both methods was conducted by direct visual inspection and evaluation through manual tracing.Results:
The average reliability of the two methods determination and the two forms of evaluation was substantial. The direct visual inspection evaluation showed the highest reliability and agreement interexaminer values for both methods, as well as the intraexaminers evaluation.Conclusion:
The reproducibility of CVM method was substantial, indicating its clinical use to determine the skeletal maturity and the ideal moment for treatment execution
Texto completo:
Disponible
Colección:
Bases de datos internacionales
Base de datos:
BBO - Odontología
/
LILACS
Asunto principal:
Desarrollo Óseo
/
Vértebras Cervicales
/
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Tipo de estudio:
Guía de práctica clínica
/
Estudio observacional
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Braz. j. oral sci
Asunto de la revista:
Odontología
Año:
2022
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
País de afiliación:
Brasil
Institución/País de afiliación:
Clinical Private Office/BR
/
Federal University Hospital of Juiz de Fora/BR
/
Federal University of Juiz de Fora/BR