Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Consenso argentino de ventilación no invasiva / Argentine consensus of non-invasive ventilation
Diez, A. R; Abbona, H; Ferrero, G; Figueroa Casas, J. C; De Vega, M; Lisanti, R; Lopez, A. M; Menga, G; Montiel, G. C; Perez Chada, D; Raimondi, A. C; Raimondi, G. A; Uribe Echevarria, M. E; Vázquez, W. D.
Afiliación
  • Diez, A. R; Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria (AAMR). s.p
  • Abbona, H; Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria (AAMR). s.p
  • Ferrero, G; Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria (AAMR). s.p
  • Figueroa Casas, J. C; s.af
  • De Vega, M; Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria (AAMR). s.p
  • Lisanti, R; Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria (AAMR). s.p
  • Lopez, A. M; s.af
  • Menga, G; Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria (AAMR). s.p
  • Montiel, G. C; Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria (AAMR). s.p
  • Perez Chada, D; Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria (AAMR). s.p
  • Raimondi, A. C; s.af
  • Raimondi, G. A; s.af
  • Uribe Echevarria, M. E; Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria (AAMR). s.p
  • Vázquez, W. D; Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva (SATI). Comité de Neumonología Crítica. s.p
Medicina (B.Aires) ; Medicina (B.Aires);65(5): 437-457, 2005. tab
Article en Es | BINACIS | ID: bin-123248
Biblioteca responsable: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is nowadays increasingly used. The significant decrease in tracheal intubation related complications makes it particularly attractive in patients with moderately acute respiratory failure (ARF) who still have some degree of respiratory autonomy. It has also been used to support patients with chronic respiratory failure. However, final outcomes are variable according to the conditions which determined its application. This Consensus was performed in order to review the evidence supporting the use of positive pressure NIV. The patho-physiological background of NIV and the equipment required technology are described. Available evidence clearly suggests benefits of NIV in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in cardiogenic pulmonary edema (Recommendation A). When considering ARF in the setting of acute respiratory distress syndrome results are uncertain, unless dealing with immunosupressed patients (Recommendation B). Positive results are also shown in weaning of mechanical ventilation (MV), particularly regarding acute exacerbation of COPD patients (Recommendation A). An improved quality of life in chronic respiratory failure and a longer survival in restrictive disorders has also been shown (Recommendation B) while its benefit in stable COPD patients is still controversial (Recommendation C). NIV should be performed according to pre-established standards. A revision of NIV related complications is performed and the cost-benefit comparison with invasive MV is also considered.(AU)
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 06-national / AR Base de datos: BINACIS Asunto principal: Respiración Artificial / Insuficiencia Respiratoria / Ventiladores Mecánicos Tipo de estudio: Guideline Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Argentina Idioma: Es Revista: Medicina (B.Aires) Año: 2005 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Argentina
Buscar en Google
Colección: 06-national / AR Base de datos: BINACIS Asunto principal: Respiración Artificial / Insuficiencia Respiratoria / Ventiladores Mecánicos Tipo de estudio: Guideline Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Argentina Idioma: Es Revista: Medicina (B.Aires) Año: 2005 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Argentina