Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Awareness of allergic enterocolitis among primary-care paediatricians: A web-based pilot survey
Comberiati, P; Landi, M; Martelli, A; Piacentini, GL; Capristo, C; Paiola, G; Peroni, DG.
Afiliación
  • Comberiati, P; University of Verona. Department of Life and Reproduction Sciences. Pediatric Clinic. Verona. Italy
  • Landi, M; Asl To 1. National System of Pediatric Primary Care. Turin. Italy
  • Martelli, A; Santa Corona Hospital. Pediatric Department. Milan. Italy
  • Piacentini, GL; University of Verona. Department of Life and Reproduction Sciences. Pediatric Clinic. Verona. Italy
  • Capristo, C; Second University of Naples. Department of Pediatrics. Naples. Italy
  • Paiola, G; University of Verona. Department of Life and Reproduction Sciences. Pediatric Clinic. Verona. Italy
  • Peroni, DG; University of Pisa. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Section of Paediatrics. Pisa. Italy
Allergol. immunopatol ; 44(5): 461-466, sept.-oct. 2016. graf, tab
Article en En | IBECS | ID: ibc-155860
Biblioteca responsable: ES1.1
Ubicación: BNCS
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Allergic enterocolitis, also known as food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES), is an increasingly reported and potentially severe non-IgE mediated food allergy of the first years of life, which is often misdiagnosed due to its non-specific presenting symptoms and lack of diagnostic guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the knowledge of clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic features of FPIES among Italian primary-care paediatricians. METHODS: A 16-question anonymous web-based survey was sent via email to randomly selected primary care paediatricians working in the north of Italy. RESULTS: There were 194 completed surveys (48.5% response rate). Among respondents, 12.4% declared full understanding of FPIES, 49% limited knowledge, 31.4% had simply heard about FPIES and 7.2% had never heard about it. When presented with clinical anecdotes, 54.1% recognised acute FPIES and 12.9% recognised all chronic FPIES, whereas 10.3% misdiagnosed FPIES as allergic proctocolitis or infantile colic. To diagnose FPIES 55.7% declared to need negative skin prick test or specific-IgE to the trigger food, whereas 56.7% considered necessary a confirmatory oral challenge. Epinephrine was considered the mainstay in treating acute FPIES by 25.8% of respondents. Only 59.8% referred out to an allergist for the long-term reintroduction of the culprit food. Overall, 20.1% reported to care children with FPIES in their practice, with cow's milk formula and fish being the most common triggers; the diagnosis was self-made by the participant in 38.5% of these cases and by an allergist in 48.7%. CONCLUSION: There is a need for promoting awareness of FPIES to minimise delay in diagnosis and unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions
RESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Enterocolitis / Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Allergol. immunopatol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Enterocolitis / Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Allergol. immunopatol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article