Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Merino-Casabiel, X; Aller, J; Arbizu, J; García-Figueiras, R; González, C; Grande, E; Jiménez-Fonseca, P; Sevilla, MI; Capdevila, J.
Afiliación
  • Merino-Casabiel, X; Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron. Radiology Department. Barcelona. Spain
  • Aller, J; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro de Majadahonda. Endocrinology Department. Majadahonda. Spain
  • Arbizu, J; Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Nuclear Medicine Department. Pamplona. Spain
  • García-Figueiras, R; Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela. Radiology Department. Santiago de Compostela. Spain
  • González, C; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro de Majadahonda. Radiology Department. Majadahonda. Spain
  • Grande, E; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. Medical Oncology Department. Madrid. Spain
  • Jiménez-Fonseca, P; Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias. Medical Oncology Department. Oviedo. Spain
  • Sevilla, MI; Hospital Universitario Regional Virgen de la Victoria de Málaga. Medical Oncology Department. Malaga. Spain
  • Capdevila, J; Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron. Medical Oncology Department and Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Tumor Unit. Barcelona. Spain
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 20(12): 1522-1528, dic. 2018. tab
Article en En | IBECS | ID: ibc-173758
Biblioteca responsable: ES1.1
Ubicación: BNCS
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of low incidence neoplasms characterized by a low proliferative activity and slow growth. Their response to targeted therapies is heterogeneous and often does not lead to tumor shrinkage. Thus, evaluation of the therapeutic response should differ from other kind of tumors.

Methods:

To answer relevant questions about which techniques are best in the assessment of progression or treatment response a RAND/UCLA-based consensus process was implemented. Relevant clinical questions were listed followed by a systematic search of the literature. The expert panel answered all questions with recommendations, combining available evidence and expert opinion. Recommendations were validated through a questionnaire and a participatory meeting.

Results:

Expert recommendations regarding imaging tools for tumor assessment and evaluation of progression were agreed upon. Available imaging techniques were reviewed and recommendations for best patient monitoring practice and the best way to evaluate treatment response were formulated
RESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Tumores Neuroendocrinos / Neoplasias Gastrointestinales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Tumores Neuroendocrinos / Neoplasias Gastrointestinales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article