Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with minor sphincterotomy for periampullary diverticular papilla
Xu, Xiao-Dan; Xu, Chun-Fang; Qian, Jian-Qing; Dai, Jian-Jun; Sun, Zhen-Xing.
Afiliación
  • Xu, Xiao-Dan; Soochow University. Changshu Affiliated Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology. Changshu. China
  • Xu, Chun-Fang; Soochow University. The First Affiliated Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology. Soochow. China
  • Qian, Jian-Qing; Soochow University. Changshu Affiliated Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology. Changshu. China
  • Dai, Jian-Jun; Soochow University. Changshu Affiliated Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology. Changshu. China
  • Sun, Zhen-Xing; Ao Yang Hospital of Zhang Jia Gang. Department of Gastroenterology. Zhang Jia Gang. China
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 111(12): 935-940, dic. 2019. tab
Article en En | IBECS | ID: ibc-190537
Biblioteca responsable: ES1.1
Ubicación: BNCS
ABSTRACT
Background To observe the outcome of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) with minor sphincterotomy (mEST) for periampullary diverticular papilla related to stone removal. Methods Patients with confirmed periampullary diverticulum (PAD) during stone removal from May 2016 to April 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. The Chi-square test with Yates correction or Fisher's exact test was used for the analysis of categorical data and a normality test was applied for continuous data. Results A total of 154 consecutive patients (89 males and 65 females, aged 51-87 years) with confirmed PAD during stone removal were included in the study. Cases were divided into the conventional EST group (n = 79) and the mEST plus EPLBD group (n = 75). The number of patients with an initial treatment success was greater in the EPLBD+mEST group compared with the EST group (96% vs 86.1%, p=0.03) and the procedure time for EPLBD+mEST was shorter than that for EST alone (46.1+/-13.7 min vs 53.3+/-11.6 min, p=0.01). The rate of complications in the EPLBD+mEST group was lower than in the EST group (17.3% vs 32.9%, p=0.04). When PAD was >15 mm, the initial success rate was higher (92.6% vs 73.9%, p=0.04) and the rate of overall complications was lower (14.8% vs 41.7%, p=0.03) in the EPLBD+mEST group than those in the EST group. Although, this was similar when PAD was <15 mm. Conclusion EPLBD+mEST might be safer and more effective than conventional EST alone for stone removal in the presence of PAD
RESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Pancreatitis / Ampolla Hepatopancreática / Esfinterotomía Endoscópica / Enteroscopia de Balón / Enfermedades Diverticulares Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Rev. esp. enferm. dig Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Pancreatitis / Ampolla Hepatopancreática / Esfinterotomía Endoscópica / Enteroscopia de Balón / Enfermedades Diverticulares Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Rev. esp. enferm. dig Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article