Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays.
Becker, S; Bowd, C; Shorter, S; King, K; Patterson, R.
Afiliación
  • Becker S; Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-4820, USA.
Vision Res ; 39(2): 331-9, 1999 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10326139
ABSTRACT
Stereoscopic depth discrimination was investigated in crossed and uncrossed directions using stimuli defined by binocular disparity differences embedded in dynamic random-dot stereograms. Across three experiments, fixation was directed to a point on the display screen (which placed crossed stimuli in front of and uncrossed stimuli behind, the background dots of the stereogram), to a point in front of the display screen (which placed both crossed and uncrossed stimuli in front of the background dots), and to a point behind the display screen (which placed both crossed and uncrossed stimuli behind the background dots). Results showed that depth discrimination was always good when the stimuli appeared in front of the background dots of the stereogram, whereas discrimination was always poor when the stimuli appeared behind the background dots. These results suggest that differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis as reported in past research arose, in part, from effects related to occlusion.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Disparidad Visual / Percepción de Profundidad Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Vision Res Año: 1999 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Disparidad Visual / Percepción de Profundidad Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Vision Res Año: 1999 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...