[The diagnosis of swine dysentery and spirochaete diarrhea. 1. Cultural-biochemical differentiation of intestinal Serpulina in routine diagnosis]. / Zur Diagnostik von Schweinedysenterie und Spirochätendiarrhoe. 1. Mitteilung: Kulturell-biochemische Differenzierung intestinaler Serpulinen in der Routinediagnostik.

Frequent incidence of Serpulina strains showing all cultural and biochemical characteristics of Serpulina (S.) hyodysenteriae except of being indole negative, and alpha-galactosidase positive isolates showing strong haemolysis on Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood and trypticase soy agar with 5% ox blood, respectively, was the cause to evaluate common biochemical and cultural methods in Serpulina routine diagnostics. To this purpose ten type and reference strains as well as 47 field strains were examined for their ability to produce indole, haemolysis, hippurate cleavage, alpha-galactosidase, alpha- and beta-glucosidase activity. Two four-hour identification-systems were used, RapID ANA II and Rosco diagnostic tablets. The ability to produce indole was determined by different methods. All investigations were carried out at least two times. For the investigation of haemolytic patterns trypticase soy agar with 10% ox blood proved to be most effective. Results received using this agar could always be confirmed by the ring phenomenon. Determining the ability to produce indole by adding p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde to bacterial growth collected on a cotton swab was confirmed to be more sensitive than other methods. Both four-hour-systems were shown to be useful in Serpulina diagnostics, though in the RapID ANA II only four of 18 available reactions could be used and the hippurate cleavage reaction has to be carried out additionally. Using cultural and biochemical methods, it was possible to assign the type and reference strains to the correct species, as well as 46 of 47 field isolates could be identified including all five known intestinal Serpulina species from swine. 27 strains were determined as S. hyodysenteriae, nine of these isolates atypically being indole negative. In contrast one canine S. pilosicoli strain was atypical showing indole production. Therefore incidence of indole negative variants of S. hyodysenteriae as well as indole positive S. pilosicoli isolates must be taken into consideration.