Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tumour epidermal growth factor receptor, erbB-2 and cathepsin D in node-negative invasive breast cancer: their impact on the selection of patients for systemic adjuvant therapy.
Tonkin, K S; McKay, J W; Stitt, L W; Tokmakejian, S; Haines, D S.
Afiliación
  • Tonkin KS; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alta. katiaton@cancerboard.ab.ca
Cancer Prev Control ; 3(2): 131-6, 1999 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10474760
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the feasibility and the economic impact of tumour EGFR, erbB-2 and cathepsin-D measurements in women with node-negative breast cancer.

DESIGN:

Consecutive tumour samples received at a regional steroid receptor laboratory from patients with node-negative breast cancer were evaluated with commercially available kits to determine EGFR, erbB-2 and cathepsin-D levels.

SETTING:

All node-negative patients whose tumours were submitted to the steroid receptor laboratory from November 1992 to March 1994 were included (n = 142). A control group of concurrent node-negative breast cancer patients from the London Regional Cancer Centre (LRCC) database were also evaluated to determine the representativeness of our sample. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

To determine the proportion of patients who were positive for the 3 newer prognostic factors relative to their risk of relapse.

RESULTS:

We found 75 positive values in 69 patients (48.6%). We demonstrated that each factor identified a different high-risk subgroup. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positivity (> 10 fmol/mg protein) was found in 16.3% of patients, with 19.9% of patients positive for erbB-2 (> 250 units/mg protein) and 17.3% positive for cathepsin D (> 70 pmol/mg protein). Between 10% and 23.2% more node-negative patients currently seen in a regional cancer centre could be offered systemic adjuvant chemotherapy based on a single positive new factor.

CONCLUSIONS:

These tumour evaluations are straightforward using material already available in a regional steroid receptor laboratory or on tumour tissue available to pathologists. The economic impact is minimal; the 1995 cost of performing all 3 evaluations is Can$425-616 (US$304-440) per patient treated depending on the number of assays per run. Prospective clinical trials incorporating tumour EGFR, erbB-2 and cathepsin D are feasible and economically viable.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Catepsina D / Receptor ErbB-2 / Receptores ErbB Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Prev Control Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 1999 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Catepsina D / Receptor ErbB-2 / Receptores ErbB Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Prev Control Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 1999 Tipo del documento: Article