Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Common and distinct neural substrates for pragmatic, semantic, and syntactic processing of spoken sentences: an fMRI study.
Kuperberg, G R; McGuire, P K; Bullmore, E T; Brammer, M J; Rabe-Hesketh, S; Wright, I C; Lythgoe, D J; Williams, S C; David, A S.
Afiliación
  • Kuperberg GR; Institute of Psychiatry, London. kuperber@helix.mgh.harvard.edu
J Cogn Neurosci ; 12(2): 321-41, 2000 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10771415
ABSTRACT
Extracting meaning from speech requires the use of pragmatic, semantic, and syntactic information. A central question is Does the processing of these different types of linguistic information have common or distinct neuroanatomical substrates? We addressed this issue using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure neural activity when subjects listened to spoken normal sentences contrasted with sentences that had either (A) pragmatical, (B) semantic (selection restriction), or (C) syntactic (subcategorical) violations sentences. All three contrasts revealed robust activation of the left-inferior-temporal/fusiform gyrus. Activity in this area was also observed in a combined analysis of all three experiments, suggesting that it was modulated by all three types of linguistic violation. Planned statistical comparisons between the three experiments revealed (1) a greater difference between conditions in activation of the left-superior-temporal gyrus for the pragmatic experiment than the semantic/syntactic experiments; (2) a greater difference between conditions in activation of the right-superior and middle-temporal gyrus in the semantic experiment than in the syntactic experiment; and (3) no regions activated to a greater degree in the syntactic experiment than in the semantic experiment. These data show that, while left- and right-superior-temporal regions may be differentially involved in processing pragmatic and lexico-semantic information within sentences, the left-inferior-temporal/fusiform gyrus is involved in processing all three types of linguistic information. We suggest that this region may play a key role in using pragmatic, semantic (selection restriction), and subcategorical information to construct a higher representation of meaning of sentences.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Semántica / Habla / Encéfalo / Mapeo Encefálico / Cognición / Lingüística Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Cogn Neurosci Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2000 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Semántica / Habla / Encéfalo / Mapeo Encefálico / Cognición / Lingüística Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Cogn Neurosci Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2000 Tipo del documento: Article