[Malignant biliary hilar stenosis: MR cholangiography compared with direct cholangiography]. / Stenosi maligne ilari delle vie biliari: correlazione tra la colangiografia con risonanza magnetica e le colangiografie dirette.
Radiol Med
; 102(1-2): 48-54, 2001.
Article
en It
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-11677438
ABSTRACT
AIM:
To assess the diagnostic value of three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) versus direct cholangiography such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) in malignant biliary stenosis. MATERIAL ANDMETHODS:
Twenty-nine patients (15 female and 14 male) (mean age 62 years) with malignant biliary strictures underwent MRC and ERC. Breath-hold 3D steady state free precession MR cholangiography was performed on a 1.5-T imager in the patients before ERC. In 25 patients findings at ERC/PTC were considered the standard of reference 19 patients underwent ERC, 5 PCT and 1 both ERC and PTC due to unsuccessful papilla cannulation during the endoscopic examination. In the 4 remaining patients the surgical specimen was considered the standard of reference. In the 29 patients studied, histology performed during direct cholangiography and the examination of the surgical specimens demonstrated that the malignant hilar stenoses were caused by hilar cholangiocarcinoma (n=7), cholangiocarcinoma of the distal VBP (n=1), gallbladder cancers (n=6), endometrial metastasis (n=2), ovary metastasis (n=1), colon metastasis (n=1), breast metastasis (n=1). The correct identification of biliary stenosis and extension of the tumor (according to the Bismuth classification) by MR cholangiography and ERC were independently assessed by two readers blinded to each other's report. The results were compared.RESULTS:
Identification of biliary stenosis and neoplastic extension were accurate in respectively 29/29 (100%) and 26/29 (89%) cases with MR cholangiography. The comparison of ERC/PTC and MRC images yielded the followingresults:
Bismuth Type I (6 vs 6), Type II (5 vs 8), Type III (13 vs 10), Type IV (5 vs 5). Our results indicate that MR is less capable of identifying the extension of small lesions at the primary confluence of bile ducts than are ERC/PCT. DISCUSSION ANDCONCLUSIONS:
MR cholangiography is a non-invasive technique for biliary tract imaging. It does not require administration of contrast medium and allows complete visualisation of the biliary ducts. MR cholangiography allowed accurate diagnosis of malignant hilar stenosis providing equal information as direct cholangiography and may therefore obviate the need for ERC/PTC.
Buscar en Google
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares
/
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
/
Colangiografía
/
Colestasis
Tipo de estudio:
Etiology_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Límite:
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
It
Revista:
Radiol Med
Año:
2001
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Italia