Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of clinical experience on quantification of clinical signs at physical examination.
Drager, L F; Abe, J M; Martins, M A; Lotufo, P A; Benseñor, I J M.
Afiliación
  • Drager LF; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Intern Med ; 254(3): 257-63, 2003 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12930235
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Although physical examination is a fundamental component of medical decision making, relatively few studies have evaluated how physicians quantify clinical signs and whether different methods of assessment have different effects on clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate a possible impact of clinical experience when attending physicians, medical residents and medical students quantify qualitative signs of physical examination in a teaching hospital.

SETTING:

Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

SUBJECTS:

A total of 244 randomly selected physicians and medical students completed a reliable and consistent eight-item questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

To compare how they quantified clinical signs of cyanosis, anaemia, jaundice, oedema and dehydration, why they used the method(s) they described, and whether the method used could affect diagnosis, further testing or patient management. A chi-square test was used to calculate differences between the groups.

RESULTS:

Whilst the majority of those surveyed tended to use a four-level evaluation for these clinical signs, attending staff physicians were more likely to employ two-level evaluations than were residents or medical students. For all five signs, attending physicians' use of dichotomous evaluations was significantly higher than that of residents or medical students anaemia (P = 0.004), cyanosis (P < 0.001), oedema (P = 0.005), dehydration (P < 0.001) and jaundice (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION:

Although medical students and residents are routinely taught to use a four-level evaluation for these clinical signs, many of those surveyed tend to abandon this experience for a dichotomous approach. Given that the clinicians in this survey tended not to change their initial approach to a patient based on the intensity of this semi-quantitative method, increased emphasis on teaching dichotomous approach evaluations in medical school should be encouraged.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Examen Físico / Competencia Clínica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: J Intern Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2003 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Examen Físico / Competencia Clínica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: J Intern Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2003 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil