Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of posterior fossa decompression with and without duraplasty for the surgical treatment of Chiari malformation Type I in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis.
Durham, Susan R; Fjeld-Olenec, Kristina.
Afiliación
  • Durham SR; Department of Surgery (Pediatric Neurosurgery), Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH, USA. srd@hitchcock.org
J Neurosurg Pediatr ; 2(1): 42-9, 2008 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18590394
OBJECT: Surgery for Chiari malformation Type I (CM-I) is one of the most common neurosurgical procedures performed in children, although there is clearly no consensus among practitioners about which surgical method is preferred. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcome of posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD) and posterior fossa decompression without duraplasty (PFD) for the treatment of CM-I in children. METHODS: The authors searched Medline-Ovid, The Cochrane Library, and the conference proceedings of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (2000-2007) for studies meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) surgical treatment of CM-I; 2) surgical techniques of PFD and PFDD being reported in a single cohort; and 3) patient age < 18 years. RESULTS: Five retrospective and 2 prospective cohort studies involving a total of 582 patients met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Of the 582 patients, 316 were treated with PFDD and 266 were treated with PFD alone. Patient age ranged from 6 months to 18 years. Patients undergoing PFDD had a significantly lower reoperation rate (2.1 vs 12.6%, risk ratio [RR] 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.69) and a higher rate of cerebrospinal fluid-related complications (18.5 vs 1.8%, RR 7.64, 95% CI 2.53-23.09) than those undergoing PFD. No significant differences in either clinical improvement (78.6 vs 64.6%, RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.95-1.59) or syringomyelia decrease (87.0 vs 56.3%, RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.91-2.25) were noted between PFDD and PFD. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty is associated with a lower risk of reoperation than PFD but a greater risk for cerebrospinal fluid-related complications. There was no significant difference between the 2 operative techniques with respect to clinical improvement or decrease in syringomyelia.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Malformación de Arnold-Chiari / Descompresión Quirúrgica / Fosa Craneal Posterior / Duramadre Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosurg Pediatr Asunto de la revista: NEUROCIRURGIA / PEDIATRIA Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Malformación de Arnold-Chiari / Descompresión Quirúrgica / Fosa Craneal Posterior / Duramadre Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosurg Pediatr Asunto de la revista: NEUROCIRURGIA / PEDIATRIA Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos