Influence of the N-terminus and the E2-loop onto the binding kinetics of the antagonist mepyramine and the partial agonist phenoprodifen to H(1)R.

Numerous competitive radioligand binding studies revealed significant differences between human and guinea pig histamine H(1)-receptors (hH(1)R and gpH(1)R), e.g. for the partial H(1)R agonist phenoprodifen. But until now, there are only few studies with regard to binding kinetics at H(1)R. Previous studies from our group revealed an influence of the exchange of N-terminus and E2-loop between hH(1)R and gpH(1)R onto affinity of phenoprodifen to H(1)R (Strasser A, Wittmann HJ, Seifert R, J Pharmacol Exp Ther 326:783-791, 2008). The aim of this study was, therefore, to examine the impact of the N-terminus and the E2-loop on binding kinetics of the H(1)R. The wild type hH(1)R and gpH(1)R and the chimeric h(gpE2)H(1)R (E2-loogp from guinea pig) and h(gpNgpE2)H(1)R (N-terminus and E2-loop from guinea pig) were co-expressed with regulator of G-protein signaling protein RGS4 in Sf9 insect cells and kinetic binding studies were performed using the antagonist [(3)H]mepyramine as radioligand. The rate constants for association and dissociation were, in dependence of the ligand, different between hH(1)R and gpH(1)R. Furthermore, the rate constants for association at h(gpNgpE2)H(1)R were significantly different compared to hH(1)R and gpH(1)R. Molecular dynamic simulation studies detected different interactions of amino acid side chains on the extracellular surface of the receptor. Based on these findings, the influence of extracellular surface onto binding kinetics and binding affinity can be explained. Thus, the extracellular surface of G protein-coupled receptors for biogenic amines, exhibits influence onto kinetics of ligand binding, onto ligand recognition and ligand guiding into the binding pocket.