Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical trial results of the HER-2/neu (E75) vaccine to prevent breast cancer recurrence in high-risk patients: from US Military Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Group Study I-01 and I-02.
Mittendorf, Elizabeth A; Clifton, Guy T; Holmes, Jarrod P; Clive, Kevin S; Patil, Ritesh; Benavides, Linda C; Gates, Jeremy D; Sears, Alan K; Stojadinovic, Alexander; Ponniah, Sathibalan; Peoples, George E.
Afiliación
  • Mittendorf EA; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Cancer ; 118(10): 2594-602, 2012 May 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21989902
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The authors conducted exploratory phase 1-2 clinical trials vaccinating breast cancer patients with E75, a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) A2/A3-restricted HER-2/neu (HER2) peptide, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. The vaccine is given as adjuvant therapy to prevent disease recurrence. They previously reported that the vaccine is safe and effective in stimulating expansion of E75-specific cytotoxic T cells. Here, they report 24-month landmark analyses of disease-free survival (DFS).

METHODS:

These dose escalation/schedule optimization trials enrolled lymph node-positive and high-risk lymph node-negative patients with HER2 (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1-3(+) ) expressing tumors. HLA-A2/A3(+) patients were vaccinated; others were followed prospectively as controls for recurrence. DFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves; groups were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS:

Of 195 enrolled patients, 182 were evaluable 106 (58.2%) in the vaccinated group and 76 (41.8%) in the control group. The 24-month landmark analysis DFS was 94.3% in the vaccinated group and 86.8% in the control group (P = .08). Importantly, because of trial design, 65% of patients received a lower than optimal vaccine dose. In subset analyses, patients who benefited most from vaccination (vaccinated group vs control group) had lymph node-positive (DFS, 90.2% vs 79.1%; P = .13), HER2 IHC 1+-2+ (DFS, 94.0% vs 79.4%; P = .04), or grade 1 or 2 (DFS, 98.4% vs 86.0%; P = .01) tumors and were optimally dosed (DFS, 97.3% vs 86.8%; P = .08). A booster program has been initiated; no patients receiving booster inoculations have recurred.

CONCLUSIONS:

The E75 vaccine has clinical efficacy that is more prominent in certain patients. A phase 3 trial enrolling lymph node-positive patients with HER2 low-expressing tumors is warranted.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fragmentos de Péptidos / Neoplasias de la Mama / Receptor ErbB-2 / Vacunas contra el Cáncer / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fragmentos de Péptidos / Neoplasias de la Mama / Receptor ErbB-2 / Vacunas contra el Cáncer / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos