Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is alcohol-based hand disinfection equivalent to surgical scrub before placing a central venous catheter?
Burch, Thomas Michael; Stanger, Brett; Mizuguchi, K Annette; Zurakowski, David; Reid, Sean D.
Afiliación
  • Burch TM; Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA. tburch333@yahoo.com
Anesth Analg ; 114(3): 622-5, 2012 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22190557
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Waterless antiseptic surgical hand scrub (1% chlorhexidine gluconate and 61% ethyl alcohol, Avagard™; 3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN), alcohol-only cleanser (62% ethyl alcohol), and traditional surgical scrub (5-minute scrub with 4% chlorhexidine soap using a sterile scrub brush with water) are techniques used for hand cleansing and disinfection. We hypothesized that alcohol-only cleanser and waterless antiseptic scrub (Avagard) would be as effective as a traditional surgical scrub for hand cleansing before placement of central venous catheters.

METHODS:

Fingers of subjects were plate-cultured for 24 hours after 5 methods of hand cleansing method 1 traditional surgical scrub (n = 49 plates produced by 14 subjects); method 2 traditional surgical scrub (5-minute scrub with water, brush, and 4% chlorhexidine soap) followed by a 15-minute break, then alcohol-only cleanser (62% alcohol) (n = 49 plates produced by 14 subjects); method 3 alcohol-only cleanser alone (n = 49 plates produced by 14 subjects); method 4 alcohol-only cleanser (62% alcohol), followed by a 15-minute break, then traditional surgical scrub (5-minute scrub with brush, and 4% chlorhexidine soap with water) (n = 49 plates produced by 14 subjects); and method 5 waterless surgical scrub (Avagard) alone (n = 116 plates produced by 38 subjects). The 15-minute break was introduced to allow a short period of recontamination, and to test for residual effects from prior cleansing.

RESULTS:

Alcohol-only cleanser alone (method 3) was significantly less effective than the traditional surgical scrub (method 1) (P < 0.001; 82% plate growth). Waterless surgical scrub (Avagard) (method 5) had a 0% observed difference (95% confidence interval [CI] -14% to 11%) compared with the traditional 5-minute scrub (method 1) (P = 0.99; 16% plate growth). When a traditional surgical scrub was used first followed by a 15-minute period of recontamination, there was a 6% observed difference in method 2 from reference (method 1) (95% CI -10% to 22%), and 0% observed difference in method 4 from reference (95% CI -15% to 15%).

CONCLUSION:

As the initial cleansing method, the alcohol-only cleanser (method 3) was significantly less effective than the traditional surgical scrub (method 1) (P < 0.001).
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cateterismo Venoso Central / Desinfección / Desinfección de las Manos / Etanol Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Analg Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cateterismo Venoso Central / Desinfección / Desinfección de las Manos / Etanol Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Analg Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos