Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cerebrospinal fluid concentration of gefitinib and erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Togashi, Yosuke; Masago, Katsuhiro; Masuda, Satohiro; Mizuno, Tomoyuki; Fukudo, Masahide; Ikemi, Yasuaki; Sakamori, Yuichi; Nagai, Hiroki; Kim, Young Hak; Katsura, Toshiya; Mishima, Michiaki.
Afiliación
  • Togashi Y; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Japan. ytogashi@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 70(3): 399-405, 2012 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22806307
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Several cases have been reported in which central nervous system (CNS) metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to gefitinib were improved by erlotinib. However, there has been no study in which cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of gefitinib and erlotinib are directly compared. Thus, we aimed to compare them.

METHODS:

We examined 15 Japanese patients with NSCLC and CNS metastases with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations who received CSF examinations during epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment (250 mg daily gefitinib or 150 mg daily erlotinib). Plasma and CSF concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS:

The concentration and penetration rate of gefitinib (mean ± standard deviation) in the CSF were 3.7 ± 1.9 ng/mL (8.2 ± 4.3 nM) and 1.13 ± 0.36 %, respectively. The concentration and penetration rate of erlotinib in the CSF were 28.7 ± 16.8 ng/mL (66.9 ± 39.0 nM) and 2.77 ± 0.45 %, respectively. The CSF concentration and penetration rate of erlotinib were significantly higher than those of gefitinib (P = 0.0008 and <0.0001, respectively). The CNS response rates of patients with erlotinib treatment were preferentially (but not significantly) higher than those with gefitinib treatment. (1/3 vs. 4/7, respectively). Leptomeningeal metastases in one patient, which were refractory to gefitinib, dramatically responded to erlotinib.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study suggested that higher CSF concentration could be achieved with erlotinib and that erlotinib could be more effective for the treatment for CNS metastases, especially leptomeningeal metastases, than gefitinib.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Neoplasias Meníngeas Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Neoplasias Meníngeas Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón