Refractive error after cataract surgery combined with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To assess refractive error after cataract surgery combined with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using adjusted keratometric (K) readings to calculate intraocular lens (IOL) power. DESIGN: Prospective, interventional case series. METHODS: One eye of 39 consecutive patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and cataract were included. To calculate IOL power before surgery, the Javal steep and flat K readings (Haag-Streeit) were adjusted by reducing their value by -1.19 diopters (D); the axial length was measured by immersion biometry, and the standard A-constant was used. Surgery included phacoemulsification, IOL (Acrysof SN60AT; Alcon) implantation within the capsular bag, and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using posterior lamella prepared with a 300-µm head microkeratome (Moria). The absolute prediction error (absolute difference between predicted and achieved refraction) was assessed 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The mean power of the implanted IOL was 23.22 ± 2.90 D. The mean predicted and achieved refractions were -0.27 ± 0.26 D and -0.23 ± 0.73 D, respectively. The mean absolute prediction error was 0.59 ± 0.42 D (range, 0.05 to -1.52 D). The postoperative spherical equivalent fell within ±0.50 D, ±1.00 D, and ±2.00 D of the predicted refraction in 55.5%, 83.3%, and 100% of cases, respectively. Had the IOL power been calculated without adjusting the K readings, the mean absolute prediction error would have been significantly higher (0.86 ± 0.62 D; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, in which posterior lamellae were prepared using a 300-µm head microkeratome, adjusting preoperative K readings by -1.19 D led to accurate IOL power calculation and highly predictable refractive error after cataract surgery combined with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.