Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in a rural state.
Charlton, Mary E; Mengeling, Michelle A; Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R; Makki, Nader M; Malhotra, Ashish; Klutts, J Stacey; Levy, Barcey T; Kaboli, Peter J.
Afiliación
  • Charlton ME; VA Office of Rural Health, Rural Health Resource Center-Central Region, and the Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center at the Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, Iowa; Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa.
J Rural Health ; 30(3): 322-32, 2014.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24164375
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Distance from health care facilities can be a barrier to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, especially for colonoscopy. Alternatively, an improved at-home stool-based screening tool, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), requires only a single sample and has a better sensitivity-specificity balance compared to traditional guaiac fecal occult blood tests. Our objective was to determine if FITs mailed to asymptomatic, average-risk patients overdue for screening resulted in higher screening rates versus mailing educational materials alone or no intervention (ie, usual care).

METHODS:

Veterans ages 51-64, asymptomatic, at average risk for CRC, overdue for screening and in a veterans administration (VA) catchment area covering a large rural population were randomly assigned to 3 groups (1) education only (Ed) group mailed CRC educational materials and a survey of screening history and preferences (N = 499); (2) FIT group mailed the FIT, plus educational materials and survey (N = 500); and (3) usual care (UC) group received no mailings (N = 500).

FINDINGS:

At 6 months postintervention, 21% of the FIT group had received CRC screening by any method compared to 6% of the Ed group (and 6% of the UC group) (P < .0001). Of the 105 respondents from the FIT group, 71 (68%) were eligible to take the FIT. Of those, 64 (90%) completed the FIT and 8 (12%) tested positive.

CONCLUSIONS:

This low-intensity intervention of mailing FITs to average risk patients overdue for screening resulted in a significantly higher screening rate than educational materials alone or usual care, and may be of particular interest in rural areas.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Veteranos / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Tamizaje Masivo / Detección Precoz del Cáncer / Sangre Oculta Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Rural Health Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Veteranos / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Tamizaje Masivo / Detección Precoz del Cáncer / Sangre Oculta Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Rural Health Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article