Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sensitive and selective culture medium for detection of environmental Clostridium difficile isolates without requirement for anaerobic culture conditions.
Cadnum, Jennifer L; Hurless, Kelly N; Deshpande, Abhishek; Nerandzic, Michelle M; Kundrapu, Sirisha; Donskey, Curtis J.
Afiliación
  • Cadnum JL; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Hurless KN; Research Service, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Deshpande A; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Nerandzic MM; Research Service, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Kundrapu S; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Donskey CJ; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA curtisd123@yahoo.com.
J Clin Microbiol ; 52(9): 3259-63, 2014 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24958803
ABSTRACT
Effective and easy-to-use methods for detecting Clostridium difficile spore contamination would be useful for identifying environmental reservoirs and monitoring the effectiveness of room disinfection. Culture-based detection methods are sensitive for detecting C. difficile, but their utility is limited due to the requirement of anaerobic culture conditions and microbiological expertise. We developed a low-cost selective broth medium containing thioglycolic acid and l-cystine, termed C. difficile brucella broth with thioglycolic acid and l-cystine (CDBB-TC), for the detection of C. difficile from environmental specimens under aerobic culture conditions. The sensitivity and specificity of CDBB-TC (under aerobic culture conditions) were compared to those of CDBB (under anaerobic culture conditions) for the recovery of C. difficile from swabs collected from hospital room surfaces. CDBB-TC was significantly more sensitive than CDBB for recovering environmental C. difficile (36/41 [88%] versus 21/41 [51%], respectively; P = 0.006). C. difficile latex agglutination, an enzyme immunoassay for toxins A and B or glutamate dehydrogenase, and a PCR for toxin B genes were all effective as confirmatory tests. For 477 total environmental cultures, the specificity of CDBB-TC versus that of CDBB based upon false-positive yellow-color development of the medium without recovery of C. difficile was 100% (0 false-positive results) versus 96% (18 false-positive results), respectively. False-positive cultures for CDBB were attributable to the growth of anaerobic non-C. difficile organisms that did not grow in CDBB-TC. Our results suggest that CDBB-TC provides a sensitive and selective medium for the recovery of C. difficile organisms from environmental samples, without the need for anaerobic culture conditions.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clostridioides difficile / Medios de Cultivo / Microbiología Ambiental Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Microbiol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clostridioides difficile / Medios de Cultivo / Microbiología Ambiental Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Microbiol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos