Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is topical corticosteroid necessary in traumatic hyphema?
Türkoglu, E B; Celik, T; Celik, E; Ozkan, N; Bursali, O; Coskun, S B; Alagoz, G.
Afiliación
  • Türkoglu EB; Akdeniz University, Department of Ophthalmology, 07100 Antalya, Turkey. Electronic address: drelifbetul@yahoo.com.
  • Celik T; Bolu Gerede State Hospital Department of Ophthalmology, Seviller St., 14900 Gerede-Bolu, Turkey.
  • Celik E; Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital Department of Ophthalmology, 54180 Sakarya, Turkey.
  • Ozkan N; Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital Department of Ophthalmology, 54180 Sakarya, Turkey.
  • Bursali O; Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital Department of Ophthalmology, 54180 Sakarya, Turkey.
  • Coskun SB; Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital Department of Ophthalmology, 54180 Sakarya, Turkey.
  • Alagoz G; Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital Department of Ophthalmology, 54180 Sakarya, Turkey.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 37(8): 613-7, 2014 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25199483
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the outcomes in the management of traumatic hyphema treated with topical corticosteroid plus supportive therapy versus only supportive therapy. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

In this retrospective study, 206 patients were divided into two groups; group I, 98 eyes were treated with topical corticosteroid 12 × 1 and supportive therapy including bed rest, keeping the head elevated (45 degrees), and hydration. In group II, 108 eyes were treated with only supportive therapy. Hyphema size, initial and final visual acuities and intraocular pressure, time to hyphema clearance, and incidence of rebleeding were evaluated.

RESULTS:

The time needed for hyphema resorption in the two groups were 60.25 ± 33.9 and 62.3 ± 28.9 hours respectively (P=0.62). There was no significant difference in rebleeding rate between the topical corticosteroid group (4.01%) and non-steroid group (6.48%) (P=0.67). The initial and final visual acuities were similar in the two groups (P=0.86). In Groups I and II, the average intraocular pressures were 19.7 ± 8.01 and 14.2 ± 10.2 mmHg respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.04).

CONCLUSION:

Patients who were treated with topical corticosteroids were no less likely to experience a rebleed or a poor visual outcome than those treated with supportive therapy alone. Supportive therapy alone may be convenient and cost-effective management strategy in uncomplicated traumatic hyphema.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Heridas no Penetrantes / Hipema / Lesiones Oculares / Corticoesteroides / Procedimientos Innecesarios / Antiinflamatorios Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Fr Ophtalmol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Heridas no Penetrantes / Hipema / Lesiones Oculares / Corticoesteroides / Procedimientos Innecesarios / Antiinflamatorios Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Fr Ophtalmol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article