Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomised trial of two nicotine patch protocols distributed through a state quitline.
Burns, Emily K; Hood, Nancy E; Goforth, Emma; Levinson, Arnold H.
Afiliación
  • Burns EK; Mercy Family Medicine, Mercy Regional Medical Center, Centura Health, Durango, Colorado, USA.
  • Hood NE; Community Properties of Ohio Management Services, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Goforth E; Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Prevention Services Division, Denver, Colorado, USA.
  • Levinson AH; Department of Community & Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Tob Control ; 25(2): 218-23, 2016 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25416755
BACKGROUND: Most telephone quitlines provide free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). An 8-week course is recommended, but few users complete it. Information is needed to help quitlines distribute NRT cost-effectively. DESIGN: Randomised two-group trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Colorado QuitLine callers who smoked 16-20 cigarettes per day at enrolment and who were eligible for and agreed to receive free NRT. INTERVENTION: Provision of 4-week versus 8-week NRT supply; the 8-week supply was shipped in halves and required participants to request the second half (split-shipment protocol). Enrolment occurred during March 2010-February 2011, follow-up concluded in November 2011, and analysis was performed in 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Point abstinence (7 and 30 day) and prolonged abstinence (6 month) from tobacco use. RESULTS: Overall, 1495 study participants were enrolled and 57.7% completed follow-up. Abstinence rates did not differ significantly between study conditions: 13.8% versus 12.4% in 4-week versus 8-week arms, respectively, (30-day point abstinence, non-respondents treated as smokers). NRT duration was similar in both groups, due in part to purchase of additional patches in the 4-week group. About one-third of the 8-week group requested the full 8-week supply and had higher abstinence rates. Cost per quit was lower in the 4-week (compared to 8-week) group. CONCLUSIONS: A randomised trial did not find worse cessation outcomes among quitline users who received half the minimum recommended course of NRT, but offering the full recommended course using a split-shipment protocol may be reasonably cost-effective and supportive of NRT adherers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01889771.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios Preventivos de Salud / Tabaquismo / Cese del Hábito de Fumar / Agonistas Nicotínicos / Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco / Prevención del Hábito de Fumar / Nicotina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Tob Control Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios Preventivos de Salud / Tabaquismo / Cese del Hábito de Fumar / Agonistas Nicotínicos / Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco / Prevención del Hábito de Fumar / Nicotina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Tob Control Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido