Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patterns and predictors of state adult obesity prevention legislation enactment in US states: 2010-2013.
Donaldson, Elisabeth A; Cohen, Joanna E; Villanti, Andrea C; Kanarek, Norma F; Barry, Colleen L; Rutkow, Lainie.
Afiliación
  • Donaldson EA; Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: edonalds@jhsph.edu.
  • Cohen JE; Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, MD, United States; Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Villanti AC; Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, MD, United States; Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Washington, DC, United States.
  • Kanarek NF; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Barry CL; Department of Health, Policy, & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Rutkow L; Department of Health, Policy, & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Prev Med ; 74: 117-22, 2015 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25735604
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study examined bill- and state-level factors associated with enactment of adult obesity prevention legislation in US states.

METHODS:

A review of bills in the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity's legislative database identified 487 adult obesity prevention bills, or proposed legislation, introduced between 2010 and 2013. Multilevel models were constructed to examine bill- and state-level characteristics associated with enactment.

RESULTS:

From 2010 to 2013, 81 (17%) of obesity prevention bills introduced were enacted across 35 states and the District of Columbia. Bills introduced in 2010 were more likely to be enacted than in 2013 (OR=9.49; 95% CI 2.61-34.5). Bills focused on access to healthy food, physical activity, general and educational programs, as well as modifying rules and procedures (e.g., preemption) had greater odds of enactment relative to food and beverage taxes (OR=8.18; 95% CI 2.85-23.4 healthy food; OR=17.3; 95% CI 4.55-65.7 physical activity; OR=15.2; 95% CI 4.80-47.9 general; OR=13.7; 95% CI 3.07-61.5 rules).

CONCLUSION:

The year of bill introduction and overall bill enactment rate were related to adult obesity prevention legislation enactment in states. This study highlights the importance of a bill's topic area for enactment and provides insights for advocates and policymakers trying to address enactment barriers.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación y Entrenamiento Físico / Política Nutricional / Legislación Alimentaria / Obesidad Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación y Entrenamiento Físico / Política Nutricional / Legislación Alimentaria / Obesidad Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article