Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Small joints replacement for hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review.
Papalia, Rocco; Tecame, Andrea; Torre, Gugliemo; D'Adamio, Stefano; Maffulli, Nicola; Denaro, Vincenzo.
Afiliación
  • Papalia R; Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Tecame A; Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Torre G; Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • D'Adamio S; Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Maffulli N; Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Mile End Hospital, London E1 4DG, UK Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy n.maffulli@qmul.ac.uk.
  • Denaro V; Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Br Med Bull ; 116: 55-68, 2015.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25990961
INTRODUCTION: Small joints replacement is a valid treatment for moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the hand. Several design and materials are now available for prostethic procedures with very different clinical and functional outcomes. SOURCES OF DATA: An online search was carried out using Medline, Cochrane and Google scholar online databases, searching for studies on small joints replacement in hand surgery. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Good functional and clinical outcomes can be achieved with silicone and pyrolitic carbon implants, either for trapeziometacarpal and metacarpophalangeal joints. In particular, the silicone spacer seems to be very effective for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthrosis, while the pyrolitic carbon total joint prosthesis produces excellent outcomes if used for metacarpophalangeal replacement. Major complications, such as persistent pain and implant loosening, have still a variable rate of occurrence. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Heterogeneity in the methodology of the assessments in the studies reviewed and the implants and techniques involved makes it difficult to carry out a complete and effective comparative analysis of the data collected. GROWING POINTS: Larger cohorts treated with the same implant should be investigated in better designed trials, to draw more clinically relevant conclusions from the evidences presented. Better methodology is also a goal to achieve, since the average Coleman Methodology Score measured for the articles included was 54.9 out of 100. RESEARCH: More and better designed studies are needed to produce clear guidelines to define the better implant in terms of clinical outcomes, function and complications for trapeziometacarpal and metacarpophalangeal joints.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoartritis / Artroplastia de Reemplazo / Articulaciones de la Mano Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br Med Bull Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoartritis / Artroplastia de Reemplazo / Articulaciones de la Mano Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br Med Bull Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido