Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Technical Note: Validation of halo modeling for proton pencil beam spot scanning using a quality assurance test pattern.
Lin, Liyong; Huang, Sheng; Kang, Minglei; Solberg, Timothy D; McDonough, James E; Ainsley, Christopher G.
Afiliación
  • Lin L; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
  • Huang S; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
  • Kang M; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
  • Solberg TD; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
  • McDonough JE; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
  • Ainsley CG; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Med Phys ; 42(9): 5138-43, 2015 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26328965
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the utility of a comprehensive test pattern in validating calculation models that include the halo component (low-dose tails) of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) spots. Such a pattern has been used previously for quality assurance purposes to assess spot shape, position, and dose.

METHODS:

In this study, a scintillation detector was used to measure the test pattern in air at isocenter for two proton beam energies (115 and 225 MeV) of two IBA universal nozzles (UN #1 and UN #2). Planar measurements were compared with calculated dose distributions based on the weighted superposition of location-independent (UN #1) or location-dependent (UN #2) spot profiles, previously measured using a pair-magnification method and between two nozzles.

RESULTS:

Including the halo component below 1% of the central dose is shown to improve the gamma-map comparison between calculation and measurement from 94.9% to 98.4% using 2 mm/2% criteria for the 115 MeV proton beam of UN #1. In contrast, including the halo component below 1% of the central dose does not improve the gamma agreement for the 115 MeV proton beam of UN #2, due to the cutoff of the halo component at off-axis locations. When location-dependent spot profiles are used for calculation instead of spot profiles at central axis, the gamma agreement is improved from 98.0% to 99.5% using 2 mm/2% criteria. The two nozzles clearly have different characteristics, as a direct comparison of measured data shows a passing rate of 89.7% for the 115 MeV proton beam. At 225 MeV, the corresponding gamma comparisons agree better between measurement and calculation, and between measurements in the two nozzles.

CONCLUSIONS:

In addition to confirming the primary component of individual PBS spot profiles, a comprehensive test pattern is useful for the validation of the halo component at off-axis locations, especially for low energy protons.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud / Dosis de Radiación / Terapia de Protones / Modelos Biológicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud / Dosis de Radiación / Terapia de Protones / Modelos Biológicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article
...