Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Expanding the Living Donor Pool "Second Act": Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment.
Romagnoli, J; Salerno, M P; Mamode, N; Calia, R; Spagnoletti, G; Bianchi, V; Maresca, M; Piccirillo, N; Putzulu, R; Piselli, P; Cola, E; Zini, G; Citterio, F.
Afiliación
  • Romagnoli J; Renal Transplant Unit, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: jromagnoli@rm.unicatt.it.
  • Salerno MP; Renal Transplant Unit, Rome, Italy.
  • Mamode N; Department of Transplantation, Guys Hospital, London, UK.
  • Calia R; Renal Transplant Unit, Rome, Italy.
  • Spagnoletti G; Renal Transplant Unit, Rome, Italy.
  • Bianchi V; Renal Transplant Unit, Rome, Italy.
  • Maresca M; Institute of Hematology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
  • Piccirillo N; Institute of Hematology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
  • Putzulu R; Institute of Hematology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
  • Piselli P; National Institute for Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani", Rome, Italy.
  • Cola E; Renal Transplant Unit, Rome, Italy.
  • Zini G; Institute of Hematology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
  • Citterio F; Renal Transplant Unit, Rome, Italy.
Transplant Proc ; 47(7): 2126-9, 2015 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26361659
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To safely expand our living donor pool, we recently decided to work on 3 areas analysis of causes of exclusion of potential donors, the results of which we recently published, introduction of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), and ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation. We sought to determine the impact of the new strategy on living donor recruitment and transplantation during over a 10-year period at a single institution.

METHODS:

From January 2005 to September 2014, we evaluated 131 living donors. Of these, 80 (61%) were genetically related, 51 (39%) unrelated, 119 (91%) ABO compatible (ABOc), 12 ABOi (9%). The analysis was divided into 2 eras era 1, 2005-2010 (n = 53) included the use of open lumbotomy and acceptance of ABOc only; and era 2, 2011-2014 (n = 78), which saw the introduction of LDN and ABOi transplantation.

RESULTS:

Forty-five (34%) potential candidates successfully donated, 67 (51%) were excluded, and 19 (15%) were actively undergoing evaluation. Overall, 53 potential donors were evaluated in era 1 (8.8 donors/year), 78 in era 2 (19.5 donors/year). There were fewer excluded donors in era 2 vs era 1 (62% era 1 vs 44% era 2), and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) significantly increased in era 2 vs era 1 (3.3/year era 1 vs 7.1/year era 2). The establishment of an ABOi LDKT program led to a 15% increase of evaluations in era 2 (12/78 donors).

CONCLUSIONS:

LDN along with ABOi LDKT allowed for an improvement in recruitment of living donors and corresponding LDKT.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Incompatibilidad de Grupos Sanguíneos / Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABO / Donadores Vivos / Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos / Nefrectomía Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Incompatibilidad de Grupos Sanguíneos / Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABO / Donadores Vivos / Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos / Nefrectomía Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article