Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementing and Evaluating a National Certification Technical Skills Examination: The Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill.
de Montbrun, Sandra; Roberts, Patricia L; Satterthwaite, Lisa; MacRae, Helen.
Afiliación
  • de Montbrun S; *Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Division of General Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada†Division of Surgery Lahey Clinic, Tufts University School of Medicine, Burlington, MA‡University of Toronto, Surgical Skills Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada§Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Surg ; 264(1): 1-6, 2016 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26764869
OBJECTIVE: To implement the Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical skill (COSATS) into American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery (ABCRS) certification and build evidence of validity for the interpretation of the scores of this high stakes assessment tool. BACKGROUND DATA: Currently, technical skill assessment is not a formal component of board certification. With the technical demands of surgical specialties, documenting competence in technical skill at the time of certification with a valid tool is ideal. METHODS: In September 2014, the COSATS was a mandatory component of ABCRS certification. Seventy candidates took the examination, with their performance evaluated by expert colorectal surgeons using a task-specific checklist, global rating scale, and overall performance scale. Passing scores were set and compared using 2 standard setting methodologies, using a compensatory and conjunctive model. Inter-rater reliability and the reliability of the pass/fail decision were calculated using Cronbach alpha and Subkoviak methodology, respectively. Overall COSATS scores and pass/fail status were compared with results on the ABCRS oral examination. RESULTS: The pass rate ranged from 85.7% to 90%. Inter-rater reliability (0.85) and reliability of the pass/fail decision (0.87 and 0.84) were high. A low positive correlation (r= 0.25) was seen between the COSATS and oral examination. All individuals who failed the COSATS passed the ABCRS oral examination. CONCLUSIONS: COSATS is the first technical skill examination used in national surgical board certification. This study suggests that the current certification process may be failing to identify individuals who have demonstrated technical deficiencies on this standardized assessment tool.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Certificación / Competencia Clínica / Cirugía Colorrectal / Evaluación Educacional / Lista de Verificación / Internado y Residencia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Certificación / Competencia Clínica / Cirugía Colorrectal / Evaluación Educacional / Lista de Verificación / Internado y Residencia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos