[Endovascular versus conventional vascular surgery - old-fashioned thinking? Part 1: interventions on the aorta]. / Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie - antiquiertes Denken? Teil 1: Eingriffe an der Aorta.
Chirurg
; 87(3): 195-201, 2016 Mar.
Article
en De
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-26801752
Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissection, descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms as well as asymptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Enfermedades de la Aorta
/
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares
/
Difusión de Innovaciones
/
Procedimientos Endovasculares
Tipo de estudio:
Clinical_trials
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Sysrev_observational_studies
Aspecto:
Implementation_research
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
De
Revista:
Chirurg
Año:
2016
Tipo del documento:
Article
Pais de publicación:
Alemania