Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) Cannot Distinguish Between Truthful and Fabricated Accounts of a Negative Event.
Bogaard, Glynis; Meijer, Ewout H; Vrij, Aldert; Merckelbach, Harald.
Afiliación
  • Bogaard G; Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Meijer EH; Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Vrij A; Psychology, University of Portsmouth Portsmouth, UK.
  • Merckelbach H; Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University Maastricht, Netherlands.
Front Psychol ; 7: 243, 2016.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26941694
ABSTRACT
The Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) is a verbal veracity assessment method that is currently used worldwide by investigative authorities. Yet, research investigating the accuracy of SCAN is scarce. The present study tested whether SCAN was able to accurately discriminate between true and fabricated statements. To this end, 117 participants were asked to write down one true and one fabricated statement about a recent negative event that happened in their lives. All statements were analyzed using 11 criteria derived from SCAN. Results indicated that SCAN was not able to correctly classify true and fabricated statements. Lacking empirical support, the application of SCAN in its current form should be discouraged.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos