Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
VTD is superior to VCD prior to intensive therapy in multiple myeloma: results of the prospective IFM2013-04 trial.
Moreau, Philippe; Hulin, Cyrille; Macro, Margaret; Caillot, Denis; Chaleteix, Carine; Roussel, Murielle; Garderet, Laurent; Royer, Bruno; Brechignac, Sabine; Tiab, Mourad; Puyade, Mathieu; Escoffre, Martine; Stoppa, Anne-Marie; Facon, Thierry; Pegourie, Brigitte; Chaoui, Driss; Jaccard, Arnaud; Slama, Borhane; Marit, Gerald; Laribi, Karim; Godmer, Pascal; Luycx, Odile; Eisenmann, Jean-Claude; Allangba, Olivier; Dib, Mamoun; Araujo, Carla; Fontan, Jean; Belhadj, Karim; Wetterwald, Marc; Dorvaux, Véronique; Fermand, Jean-Paul; Rodon, Philippe; Kolb, Brigitte; Glaisner, Sylvie; Malfuson, Jean-Valere; Lenain, Pascal; Biron, Laetitia; Planche, Lucie; Caillon, Helene; Avet-Loiseau, Herve; Dejoie, Thomas; Attal, Michel.
Afiliación
  • Moreau P; University Hospital, Nantes, France;
  • Hulin C; University Hospital, Bordeaux, France;
  • Macro M; University Hospital, Caen, France;
  • Caillot D; University Hospital, Dijon, France;
  • Chaleteix C; University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France;
  • Roussel M; Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France;
  • Garderet L; University Hospital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France;
  • Royer B; University Hospital, Amiens, France;
  • Brechignac S; University Hospital Avicenne, Bobigny, France;
  • Tiab M; Centre Hospitalier Departemental, La Roche Sur Yon, France;
  • Puyade M; University Hospital, Poitiers, France;
  • Escoffre M; University Hospital, Rennes, France;
  • Stoppa AM; Institut Paoli-Calmette, Marseille, France;
  • Facon T; University Hospital, Lille, France;
  • Pegourie B; University Hospital, Grenoble, France;
  • Chaoui D; Centre Hospitalier Departemental, Argenteuil, France;
  • Jaccard A; University Hospital, Limoges, France;
  • Slama B; Centre Hospitalier Departemental, Avignon, France;
  • Marit G; University Hospital, Bordeaux, France;
  • Laribi K; Centre Hospitalier Departmental, Le Mans, France;
  • Godmer P; Centre Hospitalier Departmental, Vannes, France;
  • Luycx O; Centre Hospitalier Departemental, Lorient, France;
  • Eisenmann JC; Centre Hospitalier Departemental, Mulhouse, France;
  • Allangba O; Centre Hospitalier Departemental, Saint-Brieuc, France;
  • Dib M; University Hospital, Angers, France;
  • Araujo C; Centre Hospitalier Departemental, Bayonne, France;
  • Fontan J; University Hospital, Besancon, France;
  • Belhadj K; University Hospital, Creteil, France;
  • Wetterwald M; Centre Hospitalier Departemental, Dunkerque, France;
  • Dorvaux V; University Hospital, Metz, France;
  • Fermand JP; University Hospital Saint-Louis, Paris, France;
  • Rodon P; Centre Hospitalier Departemantal, Perigueux, France;
  • Kolb B; University Hospital, Reims, France;
  • Glaisner S; Institut Curie, Paris, France;
  • Malfuson JV; Hopital des Armées, Clamart, France; and.
  • Lenain P; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.
  • Biron L; University Hospital, Nantes, France;
  • Planche L; University Hospital, Nantes, France;
  • Caillon H; University Hospital, Nantes, France;
  • Avet-Loiseau H; Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France;
  • Dejoie T; University Hospital, Nantes, France;
  • Attal M; Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France;
Blood ; 127(21): 2569-74, 2016 05 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27002117
ABSTRACT
The Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome conducted a randomized trial to compare bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) with bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) as induction before high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Overall, a total of 340 patients were centrally randomly assigned to receive VTD or VCD. After 4 cycles, on an intent-to-treat basis, 66.3% of the patients in the VTD arm achieved at least a very good partial response (primary end point) vs 56.2% in the VCD arm (P = .05). In addition, the overall response rate was significantly higher in the VTD arm (92.3% vs 83.4% in the VCD arm; P = .01). Hematologic toxicity was higher in the VCD arm, with significantly increased rates of grade 3 and 4 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. On the other hand, the rate of peripheral neuropathy (PN) was significantly higher in the VTD arm. With the exception of hematologic adverse events and PN, other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were rare, with no significant differences between the VTD and VCD arms. Our data support the preferential use of VTD rather than VCD in preparation for ASCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01564537 and at EudraCT as #2013-003174-27.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Mieloma Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Blood Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Mieloma Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Blood Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article