Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
German Center Subanalysis of the LEVANT 2 Global Randomized Study of the Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.
Scheinert, Dierk; Schmidt, Andrej; Zeller, Thomas; Müller-Hülsbeck, Stefan; Sixt, Sebastian; Schröder, Henrik; Weiss, Norbert; Ketelsen, Dominik; Ricke, Jens; Steiner, Sabine; Rosenfield, Kenneth.
Afiliación
  • Scheinert D; Division of Interventional Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany dierk.scheinert@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
  • Schmidt A; Division of Interventional Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany.
  • Zeller T; Department of Angiology, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany.
  • Müller-Hülsbeck S; Department of Radiology, Diakonissenanstalt zu Flensburg, Germany.
  • Sixt S; Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Schröder H; Center for Diagnostic Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, Jewish Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
  • Weiss N; Center for Vascular Medicine, Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
  • Ketelsen D; Deptartment of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Ricke J; Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Steiner S; Division of Interventional Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany.
  • Rosenfield K; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Endovasc Ther ; 23(3): 409-16, 2016 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27117972
PURPOSE: To report a subanalysis of the German centers enrolling patients in the prospective, global, multicenter, randomized LEVANT 2 pivotal trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01412541) of the Lutonix drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease. METHODS: Among the 476 patients in LEVANT 2, 126 patients (mean age 67.1±9.6 years; 79 men) were enrolled at the 8 participating German sites between August 2011 and July 2012 and were randomized 2:1 to treatment with the Lutonix DCB (n=83) vs an uncoated balloon during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA, n=43). All patients had intermittent claudication or rest pain (Rutherford categories 2-4). Average lesion length was 58 mm and average treated length was 100 mm. Severe calcification was present in 11% of lesions, and 23% were total occlusions. The efficacy outcome was primary patency at 12 months, and the safety outcome was 12-month freedom from a composite of perioperative death, index limb-related death, amputation (below or above the ankle), and index limb revascularization. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse events, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Demographic, clinical, and lesion characteristics were matched between Lutonix DCB and PTA groups, as were the final percent diameter stenosis (19%) and procedure success (91%). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 12-month primary patency rate was 80% vs 58% (p=0.015) and the composite safety endpoint rate was 94% vs 72% (p=0.001), respectively. Freedom from TLR was higher for DCBs (96%) vs PTA (82%, p=0.012). Major adverse events were similar for both groups. The benefit favoring DCB over PTA was observed in German men and women. Compared to the non-German LEVANT 2 cohort, there was a shorter time between insertion and inflation of treatment balloons (21.8 vs 39.5 seconds, p<0.001) in the German cohort. Balloons were inflated to higher pressures (9.0 vs 7.7 atm, p<0.001) but for a shorter period of time (130 vs 167 seconds, p<0.001), and although treated lesions in the German cohort had a higher baseline stenosis, final postprocedure diameter stenosis was lower (19% vs 22%, p=0.04) than in the non-German patients. CONCLUSION: Superiority of DCB over PTA in the German cohort of LEVANT 2 was demonstrated for primary patency, composite safety, and freedom from TLR. The benefit of DCB was also consistent for both genders. Geographic or regional differences in procedural variables may account for the different outcomes between the German and non-German cohorts.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Arteria Poplítea / Fármacos Cardiovasculares / Paclitaxel / Angioplastia de Balón / Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos / Arteria Femoral / Enfermedad Arterial Periférica / Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular / Claudicación Intermitente Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Endovasc Ther Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Arteria Poplítea / Fármacos Cardiovasculares / Paclitaxel / Angioplastia de Balón / Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos / Arteria Femoral / Enfermedad Arterial Periférica / Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular / Claudicación Intermitente Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Endovasc Ther Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos