Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Methods to improve patient recruitment and retention in stroke trials.
Berge, Eivind; Stapf, Christian; Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam; Ford, Gary A; Sandercock, Peter; van der Worp, H Bart; Petersson, Jesper; Dippel, Diederik Wj; Krieger, Derk W; Lees, Kennedy R.
Afiliación
  • Berge E; Dept of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway eivind.berge@medisin.uio.no.
  • Stapf C; Dept of Neuroscience, CRCHUM, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Al-Shahi Salman R; Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Ford GA; Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Sandercock P; Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • van der Worp HB; Dept of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Petersson J; Dept of Neurology and Rehabilitation, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Dippel DW; Dept of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Krieger DW; University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Lees KR; Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Int J Stroke ; 11(6): 663-76, 2016 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27118766
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The success of randomized-controlled stroke trials is dependent on the recruitment and retention of a sufficient number of patients, but fewer than half of all trials meet their target number of patients.

METHODS:

We performed a search and review of the literature, and conducted a survey and workshop among 56 European stroke trialists, to identify barriers, suggest methods to improve recruitment and retention, and make a priority list of interventions that merit further evaluation.

RESULTS:

The survey and workshop identified a number of barriers to patient recruitment and retention, from patients' incapacity to consent, to handicaps that prevent patients from participation in trial-specific follow-up. Methods to improve recruitment and retention may include simple interventions with individual participants, funding of research networks, and reimbursement of new treatments by health services only when delivered within clinical trials. The literature review revealed that few methods have been formally evaluated. The top five priorities for evaluation identified in the workshop were as follows short and illustrated patient information leaflets, nonwritten consent, reimbursement for new interventions only within a study, and monetary incentives to institutions taking part in research (for recruitment); and involvement of patient groups, remote and central follow-up, use of mobile devices, and reminders to patients about their consent to participate (for retention).

CONCLUSIONS:

Many interventions have been used with the aim of improving recruitment and retention of patients in stroke studies, but only a minority has been evaluated. We have identified methods that could be tested, and propose that such evaluations may be nested within on-going clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto / Selección de Paciente / Accidente Cerebrovascular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Stroke Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto / Selección de Paciente / Accidente Cerebrovascular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Stroke Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega