Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Imaging of Arthroplasties: Improved Image Quality and Lesion Detection With Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction, a New CT Metal Artifact Reduction Technique.
Subhas, Naveen; Polster, Joshua M; Obuchowski, Nancy A; Primak, Andrew N; Dong, Frank F; Herts, Brian R; Iannotti, Joseph P.
Afiliación
  • Subhas N; 1 Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Ste A21, Cleveland, OH 44195.
  • Polster JM; 1 Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Ste A21, Cleveland, OH 44195.
  • Obuchowski NA; 2 Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Primak AN; 3 Siemens Healthcare, Malvern, PA.
  • Dong FF; 4 Section of Medical Physics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Herts BR; 1 Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Ste A21, Cleveland, OH 44195.
  • Iannotti JP; 5 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 207(2): 378-85, 2016 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27186794
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to compare iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR), a new single-energy metal artifact reduction technique, with filtered back projection (FBP) in terms of attenuation values, qualitative image quality, and streak artifacts near shoulder and hip arthroplasties and observer ability with these techniques to detect pathologic lesions near an arthroplasty in a phantom model. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Preoperative and postoperative CT scans of 40 shoulder and 21 hip arthroplasties were reviewed. All postoperative scans were obtained using the same technique (140 kVp, 300 quality reference mAs, 128 × 0.6 mm detector collimation) on one of three CT scanners and reconstructed with FBP and iMAR. The attenuation differences in bones and soft tissues between preoperative and postoperative scans at the same location were compared; image quality and streak artifact for both reconstructions were qualitatively graded by two blinded readers. Observer ability and confidence to detect lesions near an arthroplasty in a phantom model were graded.

RESULTS:

For both readers, iMAR had more accurate attenuation values (p < 0.001), qualitatively better image quality (p < 0.001), and less streak artifact (p < 0.001) in all locations near arthroplasties compared with FBP. Both readers detected more lesions (p ≤ 0.04) with higher confidence (p ≤ 0.01) with iMAR than with FBP in the phantom model.

CONCLUSION:

The iMAR technique provided more accurate attenuation values, better image quality, and less streak artifact near hip and shoulder arthroplasties than FBP; iMAR also increased observer ability and confidence to detect pathologic lesions near arthroplasties in a phantom model.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro / Prótesis de Hombro / Prótesis de Cadera Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro / Prótesis de Hombro / Prótesis de Cadera Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article