Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Septoplasty on Voice Quality: A Prospective-Controlled Trial.
Gulec, Safak; Kulahli, Ismail; Sahin, Mehmet Ilhan; Kokoglu, Kerem; Gunes, Murat Salih; Avci, Deniz; Arli, Turan.
Afiliación
  • Gulec S; Department of Otolaryngology, Private Neon Hospital, Erzincan, Turkey.
  • Kulahli I; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
  • Sahin MI; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
  • Kokoglu K; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
  • Gunes MS; Department of Otolaryngology, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
  • Avci D; Department of Otolaryngology, Patnos State Hospital, Agri, Turkey.
  • Arli T; Deprtment of Otolaryngology, Kasimpasa Military Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol ; 9(3): 238-43, 2016 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27230274
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose is to investigate effect of septoplasty and widened nasal patency on voice quality.

METHODS:

Fifty patients who undergone septoplasty were included in the study. Thirty-three people who had similar age and distribution were enrolled as control group. Before and 1 and 3 months after surgery, anterior rhinomanometry, voice analysis by Multi-Dimensional Voice Program, and spectrographic analysis were performed to patients. The recordings of /a/ vowel were used to evaluate average fundamental frequency (F0), jitter percent, and shimmer percent. In spectrographic analyses, F3-F4 values for the vowels /i, e, a, o, and u/, nasal formant frequencies of the consonants /m/ and /n/ in the word /mini/, and 4 formant frequencies (F1, F2, F3, and F4) for nasalized /i/ vowel following a nasal consonant /n/ in the word /mini/ were compared. The differences in nasal resonance were evaluated. All patients were asked whether change in their voices after the surgery. Preoperative and postoperative voice parameters and anterior rhinomanometry results were compared separately with the control group as well as in the patient group itself.

RESULTS:

Preoperative total nasal resistance (TNR) values of patients were higher than the control group (P=0.001). TNR values of patients measured one day before surgery and after surgery in the 1st and 3rd months were different and these differences were significant statistically (P=0.001). There was no significant difference between the voice analysis parameters in preoperative, postoperative 1st, and 3rd months. As a result of their subjective reviews, 12 patients (36%) noted their voices were better than before surgery and 20 patients (61%) noted no change before and after surgery.

CONCLUSION:

Providing widened nasal cavity has no effect on voice quality.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía
...