Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Introducing routine HIV screening for patients on an internal medicine residency inpatient service: a quality improvement project.
Padrnos, Leslie J; Barr, Patrick J; Klassen, Christine L; Fields, Heather E; Azadeh, Natalya; Mendoza, Neil; Saadiq, Rayya A; Pauwels, Emanuel M; King, Christopher S; Chung, Andrew A; Sakata, Kenneth K; Blair, Janis E.
Afiliación
  • Padrnos LJ; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
  • Barr PJ; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
  • Klassen CL; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
  • Fields HE; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
  • Azadeh N; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
  • Mendoza N; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
  • Saadiq RA; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
  • Pauwels EM; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
  • King CS; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
  • Chung AA; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
  • Sakata KK; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
  • Blair JE; Mayo Clinic Arizona, USA.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27239302
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening for all persons aged 13 to 64 years who present to a health care provider. We sought to improve adherence to the CDC guidelines on the Internal Medicine Resident Hospital Service. We surveyed residents about the CDC guidelines, sent email reminders, provided education, and engaged them in friendly competition. Credit for guideline adherence was awarded if an offer of HIV screening was documented at admission, if a screening test was performed, or if a notation in the resident sign out sheet indicated why screening was not performed. We examined HIV screening of a postintervention group of patients admitted between August 8, 2012, and June 30, 2013, and compared them to a preintervention group admitted between August 1, 2011, and June 30, 2012. Postintervention offers of HIV screening increased significantly (7.9% [44/559] vs 55.5% [300/541]; P<.001), as did documentation of residents' contemplation of screening (8.9% [50/559] vs 67.5% [365/541]; P<.001). A significantly higher proportion of HIV screening tests was ordered postintervention (7.7% [43/559] vs 44.4% [240/541]; P<.001). Monthly HIV screening documentation ranged from 0% (0/53) to 17% (9/53) preintervention, whereas it ranged from 30.6% (11/36) to 100% (62/62) postintervention. HIV screening adherence can be improved through resident education, friendly competition, and system reminders. Barriers to achieving sustained adherence to the CDC guidelines include a heterogeneous patient population and provider discomfort with the subject.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Improv Rep Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Improv Rep Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido