Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Caring for women wanting a vaginal birth after previous caesarean section: A qualitative study of the experiences of midwives and obstetricians.
Foureur, Maralyn; Turkmani, Sabera; Clack, Danielle C; Davis, Deborah L; Mollart, Lyndall; Leiser, Bernadette; Homer, Caroline S E.
Afiliación
  • Foureur M; Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Turkmani S; Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Clack DC; Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Davis DL; University of Canberra, Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Australia; The ACT Government, Health Directorate, Australia.
  • Mollart L; Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Leiser B; Central Coast Local Health District, Holden Street, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Homer CS; Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: caroline.homer@uts.edu.au.
Women Birth ; 30(1): 3-8, 2017 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27318563
PROBLEM: One of the greatest contributors to the overall caesarean section rate is elective repeat caesarean section. BACKGROUND: Decisions around mode of birth are often complex for women and influenced by the views of the doctors and midwives who care for and counsel women. Women may be more likely to choose a repeat elective caesarean section (CS) if their health care providers lack skills and confidence in supporting vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). AIM: To explore the views and experiences of providers in caring for women considering VBAC, in particular the decision-making processes and the communication of risk and safety to women. METHODS: A descriptive interpretive method was utilised. Four focus groups with doctors and midwives were conducted. FINDINGS: The central themes were: 'developing trust', 'navigating the system' and 'optimising support'. The impact of past professional experiences; the critical importance of continuity of carer and positive relationships; the ability to weigh up risks versus benefits; and the language used were all important elements. The role of policy and guidelines on providing standardised care for women who had a previous CS was also highlighted. CONCLUSION: Midwives and doctors in this study were positively oriented towards assisting and supporting women to attempt a VBAC. Care providers considered that women who have experienced a prior CS need access to midwifery continuity of care with a focus on support, information-sharing and effective communication.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea / Toma de Decisiones / Enfermeras Obstetrices Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Women Birth Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea / Toma de Decisiones / Enfermeras Obstetrices Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Women Birth Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Países Bajos