Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stone-Mode Ultrasound for Determining Renal Stone Size.
May, Philip C; Haider, Yasser; Dunmire, Barbrina; Cunitz, Bryan W; Thiel, Jeff; Liu, Ziyue; Bruce, Matthew; Bailey, Michael R; Sorensen, Mathew D; Harper, Jonathan D.
Afiliación
  • May PC; 1 Department of Urology, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
  • Haider Y; 2 Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, University of Washington Applied Physics Lab , Seattle, Washington.
  • Dunmire B; 2 Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, University of Washington Applied Physics Lab , Seattle, Washington.
  • Cunitz BW; 2 Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, University of Washington Applied Physics Lab , Seattle, Washington.
  • Thiel J; 2 Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, University of Washington Applied Physics Lab , Seattle, Washington.
  • Liu Z; 3 Department of Radiology, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
  • Bruce M; 4 Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University , Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Bailey MR; 2 Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, University of Washington Applied Physics Lab , Seattle, Washington.
  • Sorensen MD; 1 Department of Urology, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
  • Harper JD; 2 Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, University of Washington Applied Physics Lab , Seattle, Washington.
J Endourol ; 30(9): 958-62, 2016 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27393000
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to measure the accuracy of stone-specific algorithms (S-mode) and the posterior acoustic shadow for determining kidney stone size with ultrasound (US) in vivo. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Thirty-four subjects with 115 renal stones were prospectively recruited and scanned with S-mode on a research US system. S-mode is gray-scale US adjusted to enhanced stone contrast and resolution by minimizing compression and averaging, and increasing line density and frequency. Stone and shadow width were compared with a recent CT scan and, in 5 subjects with 18 stones, S-mode was compared with a clinical US system.

RESULTS:

Overall, 84% of stones identified on CT were detected on S-mode and 66% of these shadowed. Seventy-three percent of the stone measurements and 85% of the shadow measurements were within 2 mm of the size on CT. A posterior acoustic shadow was present in 89% of stones over 5 mm versus 53% of stones under 5 mm. S-mode visualized 78% of stones, versus 61% for the clinical system. S-mode stone and shadow measurements differed from CT by 1.6 ± 1.0 mm and 0.8 ± 0.6 mm, respectively, compared with 2.0 ± 1.5 mm and 1.6 ± 1.0 mm for the clinical system.

CONCLUSIONS:

S-mode offers improved visualization and sizing of renal stones. With S-mode, sizing of the stone itself and the posterior acoustic shadow were similarly accurate. Stones that do not shadow are most likely <5 mm and small enough to pass spontaneously.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos Renales / Ultrasonografía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Endourol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos Renales / Ultrasonografía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Endourol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article