Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib versus hyper-CVAD plus dasatinib as frontline therapy for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A propensity score analysis.
Sasaki, Koji; Jabbour, Elias J; Ravandi, Farhad; Short, Nicholas J; Thomas, Deborah A; Garcia-Manero, Guillermo; Daver, Naval G; Kadia, Tapan M; Konopleva, Marina Y; Jain, Nitin; Issa, Ghayas C; Jeanis, Vicki; Moore, Haim G; Garris, Rebecca S; Pemmaraju, Naveen; Cortes, Jorge E; O'Brien, Susan M; Kantarjian, Hagop M.
Afiliación
  • Sasaki K; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Jabbour EJ; Department of Hematology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ravandi F; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Short NJ; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Thomas DA; Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Garcia-Manero G; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Daver NG; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Kadia TM; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Konopleva MY; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Jain N; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Issa GC; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Jeanis V; Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Moore HG; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Garris RS; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Pemmaraju N; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Cortes JE; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • O'Brien SM; Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Kantarjian HM; Clinical Science, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Irvine, Orange, California.
Cancer ; 122(23): 3650-3656, 2016 Dec 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27479888
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The clinical efficacy of hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (HCVAD) plus ponatinib has not been compared with that of HCVAD plus dasatinib in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in a randomized clinical trial.

METHODS:

The authors analyzed 110 patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL who were enrolled in 2 consecutive, prospective, phase 2 clinical trials of frontline HCVAD with either dasatinib (63 patients) or ponatinib (47 patients). Propensity score analysis with 11 matching with the nearest neighbor matching method and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis based on the propensity scores were performed to assess response rates, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) between the cohorts.

RESULTS:

Propensity score matching identified 41 patients in each cohort. With propensity score matching, the 3-year EFS rates for patients treated with HCVAD plus ponatinib and HCVAD plus dasatinib were 69% and 46%, respectively (P =.04), and the 3-year OS rates were 83% and 56%, respectively (P =.03). IPTW analysis using prematching cohorts demonstrated that patients treated with HCVAD plus ponatinib had significantly higher rates of minimal residual disease negativity by flow cytometry on day 21, complete cytogenetic response at complete response, major molecular response at complete response and at 3 months, and complete molecular response at 3 months. IPTW confirmed that treatment with HCVAD plus ponatinib was associated with longer EFS (P =.003) and OS (P =.001) compared with treatment with HCVAD plus dasatinib.

CONCLUSIONS:

The clinical outcome of patients treated with HCVAD plus ponatinib appears to be superior to that of patients treated with HCVAD plus dasatinib among individuals with Ph+ ALL. Cancer 2016;1223650-6. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cromosoma Filadelfia / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cromosoma Filadelfia / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article