Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does charge-free screening improve detection of gestational diabetes in women from deprived areas: a cross-sectional study.
Beyerlein, Andreas; Koller, Daniela; Ziegler, Anette-Gabriele; Lack, Nicholas; Maier, Werner.
Afiliación
  • Beyerlein A; Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany. andreas.beyerlein@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
  • Koller D; Forschergruppe Diabetes der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany. andreas.beyerlein@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
  • Ziegler AG; Department of Health Services Management, Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Lack N; Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
  • Maier W; Forschergruppe Diabetes der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 16: 266, 2016 09 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27613387
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) occurs in 2-6 % of all pregnancies. We investigated whether area level deprivation is associated with a higher risk for GDM and whether GDM detection rates in deprived regions changed after the introduction of charge-free GDM screening in Germany in 2012.

METHODS:

We analyzed population-based data from Bavaria, Germany, comprising n = 587,621 deliveries in obstetric units between 2008 and 2014. Area level deprivation was assessed municipality-based using the Bavarian Index of Multiple Deprivation (BIMD), divided into quintiles and assigned to each mother based on her residential address. We estimated annual odds ratios (ORs) for GDM diagnosis by BIMD quintile with adjustment for maternal obesity, maternal age, migration background and single mother status.

RESULTS:

Women from the most deprived regions were less likely to be diagnosed with GDM before introduction of charge-free GDM screening (OR = 0.76 [95 % confidence interval 0.66, 0.86] compared to least deprived areas), in 2008. In contrast, high area level deprivation was associated with significantly increased risk of GDM diagnosis in 2013 (OR [95 % confidence interval] = 1.15 [1.02, 1.29]). The OR was also elevated, although not significantly, in 2014 (OR [95 % confidence interval] = 1.05 [0.93, 1.18]).

CONCLUSIONS:

The prevalence of GDM seems to have been underreported in women from highly deprived areas before introduction of the charge-free GDM screening in Germany. In fact, women living in deprived regions seem to have an increased risk for GDM and may profit from access to charge-free GDM screening.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pobreza / Diagnóstico Prenatal / Tamizaje Masivo / Diabetes Gestacional / Análisis Costo-Beneficio Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pobreza / Diagnóstico Prenatal / Tamizaje Masivo / Diabetes Gestacional / Análisis Costo-Beneficio Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania