Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived vs Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: Meta-Analysis with Subgroup Evaluation of Intermediate Stenosis.
Baumann, Stefan; Renker, Matthias; Hetjens, Svetlana; Fuller, Stephen R; Becher, Tobias; Loßnitzer, Dirk; Lehmann, Ralf; Akin, Ibrahim; Borggrefe, Martin; Lang, Siegfried; Wichmann, Julian L; Schoepf, U Joseph.
Afiliación
  • Baumann S; Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC 29425-2260, USA; 1st Department of Medicine-Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany and with DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner s
  • Renker M; Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC 29425-2260, USA; Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Department of Cardiology, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
  • Hetjens S; Institute of Medical Statistics and Biometry, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Fuller SR; Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC 29425-2260, USA.
  • Becher T; 1st Department of Medicine-Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany and with DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Loßnitzer D; 1st Department of Medicine-Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany and with DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Lehmann R; 1st Department of Medicine-Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany and with DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Akin I; 1st Department of Medicine-Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany and with DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Borggrefe M; 1st Department of Medicine-Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany and with DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Lang S; 1st Department of Medicine-Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany and with DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Wichmann JL; Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC 29425-2260, USA; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Schoepf UJ; Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC 29425-2260, USA. Electronic address: schoepf@musc.edu.
Acad Radiol ; 23(11): 1402-1411, 2016 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27639627
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE AND

OBJECTIVES:

Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment is the reference standard for the detection of hemodynamically relevant coronary lesions. We have investigated whether coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA)-derived FFR (fractional flow reserve from coronary computed tomographic angiography [CT-FFR]) measurement improves diagnostic accuracy over cCTA. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

A literature search was performed for studies comparing invasive FFR, cCTA, and CT-FFR. The analysis included three prospective multicenter trials and two retrospective single-center studies; a total of 765 patients and 1306 vessels were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to invasive FFR on a per-lesion basis, CT-FFR reached a pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 83.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78.1-89.3), 74.7% (95% CI 52.2-97.1), 64.8% (95% CI 52.1-77.5), and 90.1% (95% CI 80.8-99.3) compared to 84.6% (95% CI 78.1-91.1), 49.7% (95% CI 31.1-68.4), 39.0% (95% CI 28.0-50.1), and 87.3% (95% CI 72.5-100.0) for cCTA alone. In 634 vessels with intermediate stenosis (30%-70%), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 81.4% (95% CI 70.4-92.9), 71.7% (95% CI 54.5-89.0), 59.4% (95% CI 35.5-83.4), and 89.9% (95% CI 85.0-94.7) compared to 90.2% (95% CI 80.6-99.9), 35.4% (95% CI 23.5-47.3), 50.7% (95% CI 30.6-70.8), and 82.5% (95% CI 64.5-100.0) for cCTA alone. The summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of CT-FFR was superior to cCTA alone on a per-vessel (0.90 [95% CI 0.82-0.98] vs 0.74 [95% CI 0.63-0.86]; P = .0047) and for intermediate stenoses (0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.88] vs 0.57 [95% CI 0.49-0.66]; P = .0027).

CONCLUSION:

CT-FFR significantly improves specificity without noticeably altering the sensitivity of cCTA with invasive FFR as a reference standard for the detection of hemodynamically relevant stenosis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Angiografía Coronaria / Estenosis Coronaria / Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico / Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acad Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Angiografía Coronaria / Estenosis Coronaria / Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico / Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acad Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article