Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of shockwave frequencies of 30 and 60 shocks per minute for kidney stones: a prospective randomized study.
Altok, Muammer; Günes, Mustafa; Umul, Mehmet; Sahin, Ali Feyzullah; Bas, Ercan; Oksay, Taylan; Soyupek, Sedat.
Afiliación
  • Altok M; a Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine , Süleyman Demirel University , Isparta , Turkey.
  • Günes M; a Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine , Süleyman Demirel University , Isparta , Turkey.
  • Umul M; a Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine , Süleyman Demirel University , Isparta , Turkey.
  • Sahin AF; b Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine , Sifa University , Izmir , Turkey.
  • Bas E; a Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine , Süleyman Demirel University , Isparta , Turkey.
  • Oksay T; a Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine , Süleyman Demirel University , Isparta , Turkey.
  • Soyupek S; a Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine , Süleyman Demirel University , Isparta , Turkey.
Scand J Urol ; 50(6): 477-482, 2016 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27670851
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

One of the factors that determines the treatment success of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the frequency of the shockwaves during the procedure. This study compared the efficacy and pain perception of shockwave frequencies at 30 versus 60 shocks/min for kidney stones. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

From August 2013 to May 2015, 160 patients with solitary, radiopaque kidney stones were randomized to SWL at 30 shocks/min (group 1) or 60 shocks/min (group 2), with 80 patients in each group. The primary outcome measure was success rate at 3 months after the last SWL session. The secondary outcome measure was pain perception during the procedures.

RESULTS:

Of the 160 randomized patients, data for a total of 148 patients (74 patients in group 1 and 74 patients in group 2) were analyzed, after the exclusion of the patients lost to follow-up or who required secondary intervention within 3 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the success rate at 3 months (68.9% vs 71.6%, p = .719). However, the mean visual analogue scale scores of all the sessions were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (5.83 vs 4.06, p < .05). Stone location, especially the lower calyceal location, was the only significant negative predictor for success according to multivariate logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:

The success rate was similar between these two frequencies. However, pain perception was significantly higher at 30 than at 60 shocks/min.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Litotricia / Cálculos Renales / Percepción del Dolor Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Urol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Litotricia / Cálculos Renales / Percepción del Dolor Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Urol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía