Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns.
Shang, Yingying; Hao, Wenyang; Gao, Zhiqiang; Xu, Chunxiao; Ru, Ying; Ni, Daofeng.
Afiliación
  • Shang Y; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
  • Hao W; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
  • Gao Z; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
  • Xu C; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
  • Ru Y; Department of Pediatrics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
  • Ni D; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China. Electronic address: dr_nidaofeng@126.com.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 91: 141-145, 2016 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27863628
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study evaluated the efficacy of a sequential hearing screening protocol using transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) tests in healthy newborns.

DESIGN:

A TEOAE screening was performed during the first 48-72 h of life. If the infants failed, an AABR test was performed at the same time, and they were referred for a TEOAE rescreening at six weeks old. The results of screening Protocol 1 (only TEOAE) were compared with those of screening Protocol 2 (sequential TEOAE + AABR screenings for the first screening and TEOAE for the rescreening). STUDY SAMPLE A total of 1062 healthy newborns were enrolled in this research.

RESULTS:

For Protocol 1, the first screening and rescreening referral rates were 11.1% and 2.2%, respectively. In contrast, for Protocol 2, the referral rates were significant lower at 3.8% and 0.9%, respectively. Using the two protocols, six infants were diagnosed with hearing loss (0.57%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Adding simultaneous AABR tests for infants who fail TEOAE testing at the first screening stage can significantly reduce referral rates without increasing misdiagnosis rates. Although this sequential screening process involves slightly more time and has a higher cost than TEOAE alone, its greater accuracy compensates for this difference.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Derivación y Consulta / Potenciales Evocados Auditivos del Tronco Encefálico / Tamizaje Neonatal / Emisiones Otoacústicas Espontáneas / Pruebas Auditivas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Derivación y Consulta / Potenciales Evocados Auditivos del Tronco Encefálico / Tamizaje Neonatal / Emisiones Otoacústicas Espontáneas / Pruebas Auditivas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China