Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In Vitro Diagnosis of Immediate Drug Hypersensitivity Anno 2017: Potentials and Limitations.
Decuyper, I I; Mangodt, E A; Van Gasse, A L; Claesen, K; Uyttebroek, A; Faber, M; Sabato, V; Bridts, C H; Mertens, C; Hagendorens, M M; De Clerck, L S; Ebo, Didier G.
Afiliación
  • Decuyper II; Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, CDE T5.95, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Mangodt EA; Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Van Gasse AL; Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, CDE T5.95, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Claesen K; Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, CDE T5.95, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Uyttebroek A; Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Faber M; Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, CDE T5.95, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Sabato V; Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, CDE T5.95, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Bridts CH; Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, CDE T5.95, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Mertens C; Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, CDE T5.95, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Hagendorens MM; Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, CDE T5.95, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • De Clerck LS; Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, CDE T5.95, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Ebo DG; Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, CDE T5.95, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
Drugs R D ; 17(2): 265-278, 2017 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28258478
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For most physicians, quantification of drug-specific immunoglobulin E (drug-sIgE) antibodies constitutes the primary in vitro measure to document immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (IDHR). Unfortunately, this is often insufficient to correctly identify patients with IgE-mediated IDHR and impossible for non-IgE-mediated IDHR that result from alternative routes of basophil and mast cell activation. In these difficult cases, diagnosis might benefit from cellular tests such as basophil activation tests (BAT).

AIM:

The aim was to review the potential and limitations of quantification of sIgE and BAT in diagnosing IDHR. The utility of quantification of serum tryptase is discussed.

METHODS:

A literature search was conducted using the key words allergy, basophil activation, CD63, CD203c, diagnosis, drugs, hypersensitivity, flow cytometry, specific IgE antibodies; this was complemented by the authors' own experience.

RESULTS:

The drugs that have been most studied with both techniques are ß-lactam antibiotics and curarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA). For sIgE morphine, data are available on the value of this test as a biomarker for sensitization to substituted ammonium structures that constitute the major epitope of NMBA, especially rocuronium and suxamethonium. For the BAT, there are also data on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and iodinated radiocontrast media. For ß-lactam antibiotics, sensitivity and specificity of sIgE varies between 0 and 85% and 52 and 100%, respectively. For NMBA, sensitivity and specificity varies between 38.5 and 92% and 85.7 and 100%, respectively. Specific IgE to morphine should not be used in isolation to diagnose IDHR to NMBA nor opiates. For the BAT, sensitivity generally varies between 50 and 60%, whereas specificity attains 80%, except for quinolones and NSAIDs.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although drug-sIgE assays and BAT can provide useful information in the diagnosis of IDHR, their predictive value is not absolute. Large-scale collaborative studies are mandatory to harmonize and optimize test protocols and to establish drug-specific decision thresholds.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Preparaciones Farmacéuticas / Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas / Hipersensibilidad Inmediata Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Drugs R D Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Preparaciones Farmacéuticas / Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas / Hipersensibilidad Inmediata Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Drugs R D Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica