Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cell-Free DNA and Active Rejection in Kidney Allografts.
Bloom, Roy D; Bromberg, Jonathan S; Poggio, Emilio D; Bunnapradist, Suphamai; Langone, Anthony J; Sood, Puneet; Matas, Arthur J; Mehta, Shikha; Mannon, Roslyn B; Sharfuddin, Asif; Fischbach, Bernard; Narayanan, Mohanram; Jordan, Stanley C; Cohen, David; Weir, Matthew R; Hiller, David; Prasad, Preethi; Woodward, Robert N; Grskovic, Marica; Sninsky, John J; Yee, James P; Brennan, Daniel C.
Afiliación
  • Bloom RD; Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine and Penn Kidney Pancreas Transplant Program, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Bromberg JS; Department of Surgery and Department of Microbiology and Immunology and.
  • Poggio ED; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Bunnapradist S; Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Langone AJ; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and Medical Specialties Clinic, Veteran Affairs Hospital Renal Transplant Program, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Sood P; Thomas Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Matas AJ; Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Mehta S; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, and.
  • Mannon RB; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, and.
  • Sharfuddin A; Division Transplantation, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Fischbach B; Division of Nephrology and Transplant, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Narayanan M; Baylor Research Institute, Dallas, Texas.
  • Jordan SC; Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, Texas.
  • Cohen D; Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Weir MR; Division of Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
  • Hiller D; Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Prasad P; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Woodward RN; Biostatistics.
  • Grskovic M; Clinical Research.
  • Sninsky JJ; Research and Development, CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, California; and.
  • Yee JP; Research and Development, CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, California; and.
  • Brennan DC; Research and Development, CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, California; and.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 28(7): 2221-2232, 2017 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28280140
ABSTRACT
Histologic analysis of the allograft biopsy specimen is the standard method used to differentiate rejection from other injury in kidney transplants. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a noninvasive test of allograft injury that may enable more frequent, quantitative, and safer assessment of allograft rejection and injury status. To investigate this possibility, we prospectively collected blood specimens at scheduled intervals and at the time of clinically indicated biopsies. In 102 kidney recipients, we measured plasma levels of dd-cfDNA and correlated the levels with allograft rejection status ascertained by histology in 107 biopsy specimens. The dd-cfDNA level discriminated between biopsy specimens showing any rejection (T cell-mediated rejection or antibody-mediated rejection [ABMR]) and controls (no rejection histologically), P<0.001 (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [AUC], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.61 to 0.86). Positive and negative predictive values for active rejection at a cutoff of 1.0% dd-cfDNA were 61% and 84%, respectively. The AUC for discriminating ABMR from samples without ABMR was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.97). Positive and negative predictive values for ABMR at a cutoff of 1.0% dd-cfDNA were 44% and 96%, respectively. Median dd-cfDNA was 2.9% (ABMR), 1.2% (T cell-mediated types ≥IB), 0.2% (T cell-mediated type IA), and 0.3% in controls (P=0.05 for T cell-mediated rejection types ≥IB versus controls). Thus, dd-cfDNA may be used to assess allograft rejection and injury; dd-cfDNA levels <1% reflect the absence of active rejection (T cell-mediated type ≥IB or ABMR) and levels >1% indicate a probability of active rejection.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / ADN / Trasplante de Riñón / Rechazo de Injerto Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Soc Nephrol Asunto de la revista: NEFROLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / ADN / Trasplante de Riñón / Rechazo de Injerto Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Soc Nephrol Asunto de la revista: NEFROLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article