Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of low-level laser therapy on the healing of human bone maxillofacial defects: A systematic review.
Santinoni, Carolina Dos Santos; Oliveira, Hiskell Francine Fernandes; Batista, Victor Eduardo de Souza; Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo; Verri, Fellippo Ramos.
Afiliación
  • Santinoni CD; Dental School, Univ. Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil; Dental School, Univ. do Oeste Paulista - UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, Brazil.
  • Oliveira HF; Dental School, Univ. Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil.
  • Batista VE; Dental School, Univ. Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil.
  • Lemos CA; Dental School, Univ. Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil.
  • Verri FR; Dental School, Univ. Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil. Electronic address: fellippo@foa.unesp.br.
J Photochem Photobiol B ; 169: 83-89, 2017 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28292696
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) to enhance maxillofacial area bone repair.

METHODS:

A comprehensive search of studies published up to February 2017 and listed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

RESULTS:

The 15 selected studies evaluated a total of 374 patients (mean age, 28.5years) who were treated with LLLT. Gallium-arsenide (GaAs) and gallium aluminium arsenide (GaAlAs) were the most commonly used devices, and LLLT parameters varied greatly. Wavelengths varied from 500 to 1000nm. Tooth extraction, distraction osteogenesis, maxillary expansion, periodontal defects, orthodontic movement and maxillary cystic defects were evaluated. From the 15 selected studies, six evaluated bone repair (primary outcomes). Of these, four studies showed improvement in bone formation after using LLLT, two demonstrated improved results for only one follow up period, and one showed no additional benefits. The other 9 studies evaluated secondary parameters related to healing (secondary outcomes) in the maxillofacial area after applying LLLT, including anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and healing accelerator effects, and quality of life related to oral health. There were no adverse or negative effects of LLLT reported.

CONCLUSION:

Within the limitation of this review, a possible improvement in bone density can be found when LLLT is applied postoperatively in maxillofacial bony defects. LLLT also seems to promote anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects and accelerate healing, as well as enhance quality of life related to oral health. However, LLLT use protocols need to be standardized before more specific conclusions can be drawn about this subject.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anomalías Maxilofaciales / Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad / Traumatismos Maxilofaciales Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Photochem Photobiol B Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: CH / SUIZA / SUÍÇA / SWITZERLAND

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anomalías Maxilofaciales / Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad / Traumatismos Maxilofaciales Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Photochem Photobiol B Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: CH / SUIZA / SUÍÇA / SWITZERLAND