Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trochlear Groove and Trochlear Cistern: Useful Anatomic Landmarks for Identifying the Tentorial Segment of Cranial Nerve IV on MRI.
Bunch, P M; Kelly, H R; Zander, D A; Curtin, H D.
Afiliación
  • Bunch PM; From the Department of Radiology (P.M.B., H.R.K.), Division of Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts paul.m.bunch@gmail.com.
  • Kelly HR; From the Department of Radiology (P.M.B., H.R.K.), Division of Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Zander DA; Department of Radiology (H.R.K., D.A.Z., H.D.C.), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Curtin HD; Department of Radiology (H.R.K., D.A.Z., H.D.C.), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 38(5): 1026-1030, 2017 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28302606
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

The trochlear groove and trochlear cistern are anatomic landmarks closely associated with the tentorial segment of cranial nerve IV. The purposes of this study were to describe the MR imaging appearances of the trochlear groove and trochlear cistern and to test our hypothesis that knowledge of these anatomic landmarks facilitates identification of cranial nerve IV in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

For this retrospective study, consecutive MR imaging examinations of the sinuses performed in 25 patients (50 sides) at our institution were reviewed. Patient characteristics and study indications were recorded. Three readers performed independent assessments of trochlear groove, cistern, and nerve visibility on coronal images obtained by using a T2-weighted driven equilibrium radiofrequency reset pulse sequence.

RESULTS:

Interobserver agreement was 78% for visibility of the trochlear groove, 56% for the trochlear cistern, and 68% for cranial nerve IV. Following consensus review, the trochlear groove was present in 44/50 sides (88%), the trochlear cistern was present in 25/50 sides (50%), and cranial nerve IV was identified in 36/50 sides (72%). When the trochlear groove was present, cranial nerve IV was identified in 35/44 sides (80%), in contrast to 1/6 sides (17%) with no groove (P = .0013). When the trochlear cistern was present, cranial nerve IV was identified in 23/25 sides (92%), in contrast to 13/25 sides (52%) with no cistern (P = .0016).

CONCLUSIONS:

The trochlear groove and trochlear cistern are anatomic landmarks that facilitate identification of cranial nerve IV in routine clinical practice.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Nervio Troclear / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Nervio Troclear / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article